2018
DOI: 10.17059/2018-4-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of an Effective Trajectory of Regional Socio-Economic Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Samara is the administrative center of the Samara region. According to statistics for 2018, the Samara city district makes the greatest contribution to the region-wide indicators of small business turnover and employment (Kuklin & Korobkov, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samara is the administrative center of the Samara region. According to statistics for 2018, the Samara city district makes the greatest contribution to the region-wide indicators of small business turnover and employment (Kuklin & Korobkov, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, it is difficult for the subjects of the Federation to expect to gain a competitive advantage due to the further improvement of regional investment legislation. In addition, options for economic development of regions are currently limited to a great extent by federal legislation and are largely determined by state development programs and priorities for the allocation of the federal budget [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a large extent, this factor predetermines the research results with a ranking table invariably led by core regions – the major financial and industrial centres. These results rarely differ from general assessments of socio-economic development [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. The database presented addresses such research limitations by taking into account the full range of factors affecting the innovation development of regions and their innovation security.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%