2011
DOI: 10.2308/accr-10195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Models in Accounting Research

Abstract: This study explains the challenges associated with the Heckman (1979) procedure to control for selection bias, assesses the quality of its application in accounting research, and offers guidance for better implementation of selection models. A survey of 75 recent accounting articles in leading journals reveals that many researchers implement the technique in a mechanical way with relatively little appreciation of important econometric issues and problems surrounding its use. Using empirical examples motivated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
478
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,056 publications
(496 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
13
478
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can happen irrespective of the inverse Mills' ratio being significant or not and will be even more apparent if we include all variables in the probit regression. Similar findings are in Lennox et al (2012).…”
Section: Motivating Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This can happen irrespective of the inverse Mills' ratio being significant or not and will be even more apparent if we include all variables in the probit regression. Similar findings are in Lennox et al (2012).…”
Section: Motivating Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results suggest that the main results in Table 4 are likely to be affected by the selection problem. The results are consistent with recent concerns regarding the selection problem in audit research (Lennox et al, 2012). In this table, we address the selection problem by using Heckman's two-stage least square approach.…”
Section: The Us Samplesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The selection bias problem in audit research has attracted increasing concerns in recent years (Lennox et al, 2012). 4 To address the potential self-selection concern, we The table reports the regression results concerning the relationship between Big N and ERC in the preand post-SOX eras.…”
Section: The Us Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, it is possible that foreign directors do not randomly join Nordic firms but, rather, self-select firms. To overcome this possible endogeneity bias, we follow prior research and use an instrumental variable (IV) approach where we estimate earnings management regressions in a two-stage least square (2SLS) framework (Larcker & Rusticus, 2010;Lennox, Francis & Wang, 2012). Consistent with Masulis et al (2012) we use distance of headquarters to airport 15 (DISTANCE_TO_AIRPORT) as our first instrument.…”
Section: Instrumental Variables Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%