Selection for feed efficiency does not change the selection for growth and carcass traits in Nellore cattle

Abstract

The objectives were to conduct a genetic evaluation of residual feed intake (RFI) and residual feed intake adjusted for fat (RFIFat) and to analyse the effect of selection for these traits on growth, carcass and reproductive traits. Data from 945 Nellore bulls in seven feed efficiency tests in a feedlot were analysed. Genetic evaluation was performed using an animal model in which the feed efficiency test and age of the animal at the beginning of the test were considered as a systematic effect. Direct additive genetic and residual effects were considered as random effects. Correlations and genetic gains were estimated by two-trait analysis between feed efficiency measures (RFI and RFIFat) and other traits. Feed conversion showed low heritability (0.06), but dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain, RFI, RFIFat, metabolic body weight and scrotal circumference measured at 450 days of age (SC450) showed moderate to high heritability (0.49, 0.28, 0.33, 0.36, 0.38 and 0.80, respectively). Similarly, ribeye area, backfat thickness, rump cap fat thickness, marbling score and subcutaneous fat thickness also had high heritability values (0.46, 0.37, 0.57, 0.51 and 0.47, respectively). Genetic correlations between RFI and SC450 were null, and between RFIFat and SC450 were strongly positive. Genetic and phenotypic correlations of RFI and RFIFat with carcass traits were not different from zero, as correlated responses for carcass traits were also not different from zero. The Nellore selection for feed efficiency by RFI or RFIFat allows the recognition of feed efficient animals, with DMI reduction and without significant changes in growth and carcass traits. However, because of the observed results between RFIFat and SC450, selection of animals should be analysed with caution and a preselection for reproductive traits is necessary to avoid reproductive impairments in the herd. K E Y W O R D S Bos taurus indicus, carcass traits, genetic parameters, performance test, residual feed intake | 465 MORAES Et Al. How to cite this article: Moraes GF, Abreu LRA, Toral FLB, et al. Selection for feed efficiency does not change the selection for growth and carcass traits in Nellore cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 2019;136:464-473. https ://doi.

Effects of residual feed intake divergence on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and blood biochemical parameters in small-sized meat ducks

“…These results are similar to what Zhang et al (2017b) , Yuan et al (2015) , and Yan et al (2019) reported in Pekin ducks, laying chickens, and yellow broilers, respectively. Similarly, previous studies have confirmed that RFI is independent of BW and BWG in mammals ( Rajaei Sharifabadi et al, 2016 ; Torres-Vázquez et al, 2018 ; Moraes et al, 2019 ). Considering the results of the current and previous studies, it may be believed that the selection for RFI can effectively reduce the FI and improve FE without affecting the BWG and marketing BW of small-sized meat ducks.…”

Apparent digestibility and ingestive behavior of Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake

“…The average amplitude of 2.07 kg day − 1 of DMI detected between low and high RFI classes indicated the impact of genetic selection on this characteristic in reducing feed inputs without compromising growth performance (Moraes et al, 2019). Feed intake was signi cantly different between divergent classes of RFI and they were highly correlated.…”

Main regulatory factors of marbling level in beef cattle

“… Carvalho et al. (2019) and Moraes et al. (2019) showed that the estimated heritability for MS in Nellore cattle was from 0.34 and 0.47.…”

“…(2020a) Nellore 896 0.34 Carvalho et al. (2019) Nellore 940 0.47 Moraes et al. (2019) Red Angus 15,260 0.35 McAllister et al.…”