2020
DOI: 10.1017/ssh.2020.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection Bias Encountered in the Systematic Linking of Historical Census Records

Abstract: ABSTRACT Linked historical records typically are unrepresentative of the population from which they are drawn even if the method of linking is restricted to time-invariant matching criteria. An example drawn from Canadian census records illustrates the nature of bias that may afflict even a carefully linked sample. The use of potentially time-varying match criteria doubles the size of a linked sample at a modest cost in terms of additional bias. This trade-off is attractive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A trade-off exists between increasing sample size and introducing linked records more selective on less representative characteristics when using family information to disambiguate. Our view is that this process is worthwhile if it allows researchers to address questions where large sample size is essential (Antonie et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Linked Canadian Census Data 1871-1901mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trade-off exists between increasing sample size and introducing linked records more selective on less representative characteristics when using family information to disambiguate. Our view is that this process is worthwhile if it allows researchers to address questions where large sample size is essential (Antonie et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Linked Canadian Census Data 1871-1901mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average linkage achieved was 22.7 percent of the starting population of tagged employers and masters. 7 This linkage rate is fairly typical for census linkage lacking accurate training data, and where transcription errors and variations in name recording occur (Winkler 2014;Massey 2017;Goeken et al 2017;Antonie 2020); it is almost identical to that achieved by Long (2013: Table 1). 8 It also reflects drawing match thresholds high to minimise false positives to maximise accuracy.…”
Section: Linking Inter-census Recordsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…7 Coding and cleaning of proprietors summarized in (van Lieshout et al 2017); birthplace standardization follows Schürer et al (2015) and Schürer and Day (2019). linkage rate is fairly typical for census linkage lacking accurate training data, and where transcription errors and variations in name recording occur (Antonie 2020;Goeken et al 2017;Massey 2017;Winkler 2014); it is almost identical to that achieved by Long (2013: table 1). 9 It also reflects drawing match thresholds high to minimize false positives to maximize accuracy.…”
Section: Linking Intercensus Recordsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations