“…Archival science and records management have developed rich and useful practices for systematically collecting and appraising digital content (Eastwood, 2004; Whyte & Wilson, 2010), but archival approaches tend to be more applicable to the retention of data for the scientific record than to our focus on supporting re‐use (Palmer, Renear & Cragin, 2008). Moreover, there remains a gulf between institutional and scientific notions of a record, a collection, and their representation in a digital form (Esanu, Davidson, Ross & Anderson, 2004). Library and information science collection development principles and criteria, which are driven by assessment of service community needs, may be effectively adapted to data repository practice, but existing collection evaluation techniques will need to be revised for data content.…”