2013
DOI: 10.17221/45/2013-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the efficient harvesting method using multiple-criteria analysis: A case study in south-west Western Australia

Abstract: Different factors can impact on the timber harvesting methods including stand characteristics, ground conditions, extraction distance, climate, silvicultural treatments and social interests. The multiple-criteria analysis is an effective methodology for helping foresters decide what system to apply depending on their operations specifications. Four harvesting methods were compared in Western Australian Eucalypt plantations including cut-to-length (CTL), in-field chipping using a delimbing and debarking flail i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another comprehensive trial was conducted in a Eucalyptus globulus plantation in south-west Western Australia (Ghaffariyan and Brown, 2013) where efficiency of four harvesting systems was compared.…”
Section: Figure 1 Tigercat 630c Skidder Operating Within Ifc-ddc In Western Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another comprehensive trial was conducted in a Eucalyptus globulus plantation in south-west Western Australia (Ghaffariyan and Brown, 2013) where efficiency of four harvesting systems was compared.…”
Section: Figure 1 Tigercat 630c Skidder Operating Within Ifc-ddc In Western Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest owner needs to tradeoff between lower off-road traffic area and a higher profit margins, unless production costs decrease or monetary compensations are paid out. The application of a multi-criteria analysis, which has been richly taken up as a decision-support tool in forest management planning and practice, might help to compare alternative management operations on a cumulative preference scale [53].…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an MCA provides a proven suite of methods for sustainability evaluation in the context of forest management [31,[52][53][54][55]. In particular, its use in SIA of forest-wood chains has been demonstrated previously [33,56,57]. MCA strives at contributing a cumulative assessment of alternative options that combines all indicator performances into one common preference ranking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%