Selecting multiple intelligences on children with weighted product, analytical hierarchy process, simple additive weighting and TOPSIS

Abstract

Multiple intelligence is intelligence possessed by every human being, among these intelligences are linguistic intelligence, musical intelligence, naturalist intelligence, visual-spatial intelligence, logic-mathematical intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, and kinesthesis intelligence. Various methods are carried out by researchers to find out intelligence such as through numbers, images, music, words, physical and social-emotional activities. The purpose of this study is to decide and classify student intelligence based on multiple intelligence. The method used is Weighted Product (WP), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW), ELimination Et Choix TRADITIONAL REAL (ELECTRE), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The four methods are a method that is in MADM and there have been many studies related to that method but no one has examined the determination of multiple intelligence related to these four methods. The results of the Weighted Product method calculation have the highest preference value 0.189261912 namely Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence, Analytical Hierarchy Process Method has the highest preference value 0.294117647 Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence, Simple Additive Weighting method has the highest preference value 0.677316667 verbal-Linguistic Intelligence and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method has the highest value 0.679314281 Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence.

Profession recommendation based on multiple intelligence for high school students

“…In a journal entitled Selecting multiple intelligences on children with weighted product, analytical hierarchy process, simple additive weighting and TOPSIS, it aims to determine student intelligence based on multiple intelligences to classify intelligence and know how to learn based on the eight intelligences (Ahsan et al, 2019). This research does not create a system or program, it only uses the SPSS 22.0 tool which is used to process data from questionnaire results.…”

Emprego da análise hierárquica de processos para avaliação do nível de importância das inteligências múltiplas em discentes de cursos de graduação

“…Após o descarte de teses e dissertações, restaram nessa coleta apenas sete ar� gos que u� lizavam o Processo de Análise Hierárquica (AHP) em conjunto com a Teoria das Inteligências Múl� plas (IM). Dos sete trabalhos, três se concentravam na área de saúde (Rezaie, 2012(Rezaie, , 2014 e quatro possuíam aplicação na área da educação (Liao, 2016;Oktavia e Madyatmadja, 2018;Ahsan, 2019;Yan, 2019). Dessa maneira, iden� fi camos uma lacuna para podermos empregar o método AHP na teoria das IMs.…”

“…Após o descarte de teses e dissertações restaram nessa coleta apenas sete ar� gos que u� lizavam o método de análise hierárquica em conjunto com a teoria das inteligências múl� plas. Dos sete trabalhos, três se concentravam na área de saúde (Rezaie et al, 2012(Rezaie et al, , 2014 e quatro possuíam aplicação na área da educação (Chin-Wen et al, 2016;Oktavia e Madyatmadja 2018;Ahsan et al, 2019;Peiyu, 2019). Porém, nenhum desses trabalhos apresentou uma aplicação do AHP na teoria das IMs através da avaliação mul� criterial das IMs em perfi s de indivíduos, levando em conta a maneira como o perfi l se iden� fi ca com cada inteligência.…”

The effects of multiple intelligences theory on learning success: A meta-analysis in social science

“…Then, theological wisdom and existential intelligence were applied to its growth. Several methods can be used to measure the level of multiple intelligence, such as the multi-attribute decision making (MADM) method using the weighted product (WP) method [10], analytic hierarchy process (AHP), simple additive weighting (SAW) method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [11].…”