CCECE 2003 - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Toward a Caring and Humane Technology (Cat. No.03CH374
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2003.1226037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting fibre delay line distributions for travelling buffers in an all-optical packet switched cross-connect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Configurations, where no such regularity was imposed a priori, were considered in e.g. [6,13] and [28] and the already cited work of Almeida et al Further, we assume the buffer feeds into a single outgoing channel. As a consequence, a single fiber for each value of realizable delay n D (n = 0, 1, .…”
Section: Fiber Delay Line Optical Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configurations, where no such regularity was imposed a priori, were considered in e.g. [6,13] and [28] and the already cited work of Almeida et al Further, we assume the buffer feeds into a single outgoing channel. As a consequence, a single fiber for each value of realizable delay n D (n = 0, 1, .…”
Section: Fiber Delay Line Optical Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of is given by if if (9) By using the distribution of [ (9)], the distribution of [ (8)] can be evaluated using matrix inversion. The mean number of packets that enter the switch in a given time slot, , is the mean of the binomial distribution associated with the random variable, , and hence, (10) The mean number of packets that are dropped in a time slot, , is the mean number of packets represented by that exceeds the number of FDLs, , and hence, (11) Thus, the probability of blocking of the switch, , is the ratio of the mean number of packets that are dropped to the mean number of packets that enter the switch in a given time slot. Thus, (12) The utilization of the FDLs is load dependent.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation time delay is usually chosen to be a multiple of the packet transmission time. Optical buffering schemes that use FDL for contention resolution can be divided into two categories: feedforward [9], [11], [14], [15], and feedback FDL buffering [1], [3], [12], [17]. In feed-forward buffering, a contending packet is delayed at the output port and leaves the node after the propagation delay of the traversed FDL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%