2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00074-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
275
1
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
275
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold used in this transformation influences not only the predicted distribution area for the conservation features, but also the outputs of conservation planning process and has to be carefully set to ensure a suitable use (Wilson et al, 2005b). Moreover, some reserve selection methods based on presence-absence data may fail to consider persistence of targets in reserve selection (Araújo & Williams, 2000;or Teeffelen et al, 2006). We dealt with persistence more thoroughly by using present probabilities of occurrence (see Cabeza et al 2004), instead of potential probabilities of sites used in the reference condition approach (see Linke et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The threshold used in this transformation influences not only the predicted distribution area for the conservation features, but also the outputs of conservation planning process and has to be carefully set to ensure a suitable use (Wilson et al, 2005b). Moreover, some reserve selection methods based on presence-absence data may fail to consider persistence of targets in reserve selection (Araújo & Williams, 2000;or Teeffelen et al, 2006). We dealt with persistence more thoroughly by using present probabilities of occurrence (see Cabeza et al 2004), instead of potential probabilities of sites used in the reference condition approach (see Linke et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We dealt with persistence more thoroughly by using present probabilities of occurrence (see Cabeza et al 2004), instead of potential probabilities of sites used in the reference condition approach (see Linke et al 2007). This probability of occurrence indicates the likelihood with which a species is present in a planning unit considering different species-dependent factors such as habitat quality requirements or vulnerability to threats (Araújo & Williams, 2000). Instead of using just reference site distributions (Linke et al 2007), our present distribution models were built on the whole datasetusing even sites with perturbed fish communities and including human-influenced C o p y f o r R e v i e w environmental variables as predictors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si asumimos que el efecto de estos cambios en la composición aumenta con la distancia entre las unidades territoriales, es más probable que dos unidades similares faunísticamente, pero separadas espacialmente, presenten determinadas singularidades en su composición. Ello puede deberse a: i) que la conectividad y la persistencia de las poblaciones se vea interrumpida (Araújo & Williams, 2000;Ferrier, 2002), y/o ii) que la actuación de factores contingentes histórico-geográficos haya provocado pequeñas variaciones entre sus inventarios (Ricklefs & Schluter, 1993). Debido a ello, se ha calculando el producto de la matriz de distancias geográficas entre las unidades territoriales (distancia euclídea a partir de su latitud y longitud) y la matriz original de distancias faunísticas.…”
Section: Clasificaciónunclassified
“…On the other hand, niche-based models project species distributions by analyzing the relationships between species distributions and a number of environmental variables (Synes & Osborne, 2011). Although these relatively simple models may under-represent complex natural systems by neglecting competitive interactions, species plasticity, adaptation and time-lag (Davis et al, 1998;Hannah et al, 2002;Pearson & Dawson, 2003), with a good understanding of the modelling techniques, and appropriate model validation and testing, they can be regarded as the primary tools for projecting species range shifts and extinction risk, evaluating conservation priorities and assessing reserve designs (Ara ujo & Williams, 2000;Akcakaya et al, 2006;Hijmans & Graham, 2006;Gallagher et al, 2013;Duckett et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%