2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4266(02)00261-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting a portfolio with skewness: Recent evidence from US, European, and Latin American equity markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 To explain their differences, consider portfolio selection as an example. We assumed a portfolio selection problem with skewness that adopt the Polynomial Goal programming (PGP) method for optimisation, see Lai (1991), Chunhachinda, et al (1997 and Prakash, et al (2003) for more details. In constructing the optimisation, the…”
Section: Risk Measures Of Variance and Below-target Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 To explain their differences, consider portfolio selection as an example. We assumed a portfolio selection problem with skewness that adopt the Polynomial Goal programming (PGP) method for optimisation, see Lai (1991), Chunhachinda, et al (1997 and Prakash, et al (2003) for more details. In constructing the optimisation, the…”
Section: Risk Measures Of Variance and Below-target Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephens and Proffitt (1991) extend the work to develop a generalized performance evaluation model which allows for multiple moments of utility and find that higher moments especially skewness has significant impact on the performance rankings of internationally diversified mutual funds [18]. Lai (1991) [19], Chunhachinda, Dandapanib, Hamidb, Prakash (1997) [20] and Prakash, Chang, Pactwa (2003) [21] explore the portfolio selection with skewness by formulating a goal programming that provides a set of weights for an optimum investment portfolio which satisfy some competing objectives that maximizes both the expected returns and positive skewness, and simultaneously minimize the risk (variance).…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. In order to elaborate their differences, we consider a portfolio selection problem along with skewness, which fits Polynomial Goal programming (PGP) framework to optimization; see for more details Chunhachinda et al (1997) and Prakash et al (2003). To make the optimization, the standard statistical moment of distributions are incorporated where investors show a preference on higher values than skewness and mean returns, and detestation on higher values than kurtosis and variance (Scott and Horvath, 1980).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%