2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time impact analysis. Arditi (2006) comments on the usefulness of each of these concluding that time impact analysis is the most reliable. Despite this, the choice of methodology can be influenced by a variety of factors, most notably, the availability of records (Braimah, 2008).…”
Section: Delay Analysis: the Current Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time impact analysis. Arditi (2006) comments on the usefulness of each of these concluding that time impact analysis is the most reliable. Despite this, the choice of methodology can be influenced by a variety of factors, most notably, the availability of records (Braimah, 2008).…”
Section: Delay Analysis: the Current Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize this dispute, [13] recommended the use of schedule as contract document. In addition to that, a fair and effective evaluation of delay impact is possible if the most appropriate delay analysis method is selected [14]. Arbitration, litigation and total abandonment seem to be the least frequent effects of construction delay.…”
Section: B Effects Of Construction Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the reviews by previous studies (Bubshait and Cunningham 1998;Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon 2006;Mohan and Al-Gahtani 2006;Yang and Kao 2009) and this study, four methodologies (as-planned expanded technique, but-for technique, window analysis technique, and isolated collapsed as-built delay analysis) are selected for evaluating their abilities in lost productivity calculation. Table 1 shows the evaluation results.…”
Section: Ability To Calculate Lost Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For solving the second cause, several studies have proposed various innovative schedule delay analysis methodologies or improved existed methodologies, i.e. global impact, net impact, adjusted as-built CPM (Critical Path Method), as-planned expanded, but-for, snapshot, time impact, windows, isolated delay type techniques and isolated collapsed but-for delay analysis methodology (Bubshait and Cunningham 1998;Arditi and T. Pattanakitchamroon 2006;Yang and Kao 2009). However, most of the methodologies focused on the analysis of surface th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2010) data (as-planned and as-built schedules), few of them on evaluating the effects of root causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%