1971
DOI: 10.6028/nbs.tn.270-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected values of chemical thermodynamic properties :

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
83
1
6

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
83
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The CC bond length of relaxed structure of each model sample of graphene is 1.42 Å and the NN bond length of an isolated nitrogen molecule is 1.11 Å which are in agreement with the available data . The cohesive energy of each model sample is found to be 8.05 eV/atom, in close agreement with the previous theoretical and experimental values of 8.57 and 7.39 eV, respectively. We find the bond energy of each model sample of graphene as 5.37 eV, in good agreement with the previous value of 4.93 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The CC bond length of relaxed structure of each model sample of graphene is 1.42 Å and the NN bond length of an isolated nitrogen molecule is 1.11 Å which are in agreement with the available data . The cohesive energy of each model sample is found to be 8.05 eV/atom, in close agreement with the previous theoretical and experimental values of 8.57 and 7.39 eV, respectively. We find the bond energy of each model sample of graphene as 5.37 eV, in good agreement with the previous value of 4.93 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The calculated values in this work are in consistent with the available experimental data in Ref. 37,38 Because of different approximation method resulting in calculation accuracy, the values are a little difference with the values obtained by Hui Zhang et al 28 , and in Ref. 28,37,38 the enthalpy of formation is expressed as kJ/mol, we calculated the enthalpy of formation expresses as eV/atom.…”
Section: Methods and Detailssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…37,38 Because of different approximation method resulting in calculation accuracy, the values are a little difference with the values obtained by Hui Zhang et al 28 , and in Ref. 28,37,38 the enthalpy of formation is expressed as kJ/mol, we calculated the enthalpy of formation expresses as eV/atom. The stability of these compounds forms the following sequence: GaMg> O-Ga 2 Mg > H-Ga 2 Mg > Ga 5 Mg 2 > GaMg 2 > Ga 2 Mg 5 .…”
Section: Methods and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is, however, in contrast with the present study where crystallization of BaSO 4 is noted instead of Na 2 SO 4 . A lower free energy of formation of BaSO 4 as compared with Na 2 SO 4 is perhaps responsible in this case 20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%