2020
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SELAdb: A database of exonic variants in a Brazilian population referred to a quaternary medical center in São Paulo

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: High-throughput sequencing of genomes, exomes, and disease-focused gene panels is becoming increasingly common for molecular diagnostics. However, identifying a single clinically relevant pathogenic variant among thousands of genetic polymorphisms is a challenging task. Publicly available genomic databases are useful resources to filter out common genetic variants present in the population and enable the identification of each disease-causing variant. Based on our experience applying t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with conventional Sanger sequencing in another family, this revealed four missense variants in exon 2 of the POU1F1 beta isoform, each in an unrelated family ( Figure 1A, 2A ). The four patient POU1F1 missense variants are absent from gnomAD and in-house population-matched exome databases 39,40 , and they are predicted to be damaging by several bioinformatic algorithms ( Table 1 ). Remarkably, these variants clustered in four consecutive codons: c.148T>G (p.S50A), c.152T>G (p.I51S), c.155T>G (p.L52W), and c.157T>G (p.S53A) in NM 001122757.3 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with conventional Sanger sequencing in another family, this revealed four missense variants in exon 2 of the POU1F1 beta isoform, each in an unrelated family ( Figure 1A, 2A ). The four patient POU1F1 missense variants are absent from gnomAD and in-house population-matched exome databases 39,40 , and they are predicted to be damaging by several bioinformatic algorithms ( Table 1 ). Remarkably, these variants clustered in four consecutive codons: c.148T>G (p.S50A), c.152T>G (p.I51S), c.155T>G (p.L52W), and c.157T>G (p.S53A) in NM 001122757.3 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exome and the targeted panel sequencing data were screened for rare variants with minor allele frequency <0.1% in the public databases: Genome Aggregation Database, 17 1000 Genomes, 18 the Brazilian population database 19 and database of exonic variants in a Brazilian population referred to as a quaternary medical centre in São Paulo 20 . This study then selected the rare variants located in the exonic and consensus splice‐site regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exome and panel variant sequencing analysis were similar, as they were performed in isolated patients. The filtering pipeline took into consideration exonic and splice site regions, as well as Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) of less than 1% in international and national populational databases: gnomAD (gnomad.broadinstitute.org), 1000 Genomes, ABraOM (abraom.ib.usp.br) 16 and internal database SELAdb (intranet.fm.usp.br/sela) 17 . First, homozygous variants were considered assuming an autosomal recessive disorder.…”
Section: Filtering Process and Sequencing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%