2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic yield displacements of plane moment resisting and x-braced steel frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For steel frame building the following expression is introduced [6]. Step 7: Determination of the system effective period: the equivalent period at peak displacement response is extracted from the displacement spectra, entering with the design displacement Step 8: Determination of design base shear: when the effective period of the substitute structure is calculated in Step 7, the effective stiffness (Keq) is determined using Equation (7). The effective stiffness of the substitute structure is defined as the secant stiffness to maximum response, as drawn in Figure 1(b).…”
Section: Fundamental Of Ddbd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For steel frame building the following expression is introduced [6]. Step 7: Determination of the system effective period: the equivalent period at peak displacement response is extracted from the displacement spectra, entering with the design displacement Step 8: Determination of design base shear: when the effective period of the substitute structure is calculated in Step 7, the effective stiffness (Keq) is determined using Equation (7). The effective stiffness of the substitute structure is defined as the secant stiffness to maximum response, as drawn in Figure 1(b).…”
Section: Fundamental Of Ddbd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations were obtained according to fundamentals of mechanics science. Furthermore, Dimopoulos et al [7] suggested simple equations for determination lateral displacements at first yielding of moment resisting and concentrically braced steel frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the yield displacement, a simple initial estimate would be 0.5-0.6% of the building height (or δ y = 0.16-0.20 m) based on Aschheim [15], where δ y is expressed as a function of geometrical and material properties for different structural configurations. Similar expressions, already proposed in the literature (a relevant review is shortly provided in [36]), could be also used to determine the yield displacement. However, in our case, the pushover curve (Figure 3, left) allows us to directly determine an accurate result of δ y = 0.217 m, not far from the aforementioned simpler approximation.…”
Section: Yfs-based Redesign Of the Case Study Buildingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Alternatively, several approaches of varying simplicity can be considered to define the parameters involved in the YFS framework. For the sake of example, the yield displacement can be readily defined using simplified formulae, already proposed in literature that associate δ y with various geometrical characteristics (e.g., typical floor's or total structure's height, column depth and beam span) as well as structural (e.g., longitudinal reinforcement ratio and column overstrength ratio) and material properties (e.g., yield strain of steel reinforcing bars) [15,36,[43][44][45][46]. Experts engineering judgement could be even used for a preliminary estimation of the yield displacement since it has been found to be of higher stability for a given structural configuration than the fundamental period [13,15].…”
Section: Options For Simplified Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, nonlinear regression analysis was employed to provide reliable estimates of the maximum roof displacement, the maximum interstory drift ratio, and the behavior factor [12]. Following this, approximate formulae for the estimation of lateral displacements at first yielding of plane steel frames under seismic excitations were provided for use in a performance-based seismic design by Dimopoulos et al [13]. ese formulae were also functions of the geometrical and design properties of the frames and derived on the basis of seismic response of 36 moment-resisting and 36 x-braced plane steel frames, under 84 ordinary seismic ground motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%