1988
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(88)90189-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic visibility of fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenwood and Williamson (1967) predicts that compliance is approximately proportional to ratio of root mean square of surface elevation to normal force. As such, at low compliance interfaces, such as the nominally flat ground metal surfaces used here, the change in arrival time is expected to be linear with load (Pyrak-Nolte, Cook, and Myer, 1987). In calibrations with a fused silica blank, the remaining interface time delay demonstrates a reasonable degree of linearity up to 30 kN load at all test conditions (figure 8).…”
Section: B Transmitted Wave Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Greenwood and Williamson (1967) predicts that compliance is approximately proportional to ratio of root mean square of surface elevation to normal force. As such, at low compliance interfaces, such as the nominally flat ground metal surfaces used here, the change in arrival time is expected to be linear with load (Pyrak-Nolte, Cook, and Myer, 1987). In calibrations with a fused silica blank, the remaining interface time delay demonstrates a reasonable degree of linearity up to 30 kN load at all test conditions (figure 8).…”
Section: B Transmitted Wave Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To measure delays resulting from the sample assembly we performed a series of calibration runs using a flawless fused silica blank, which has a known wave velocity that does not vary with pres- When removing all possible contributions relating to the changes in sample and loading piston length we still observe a small time delay (0-20 ns) that varies with load (figure 8). This delay is interpreted to arise from loaded surface contact compliance changes (Pyrak-Nolte, Cook, and Myer, 1987;Möllhoff and Bean, 2009). Interface group time delay is directly proportional to contact compliance (Pyrak-Nolte, Cook, and Myer, 1987).…”
Section: B Transmitted Wave Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations