1997
DOI: 10.1007/s000240050100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of High Frequency Microseismicity Recorded at an Underground Hardrock Mine

Abstract: This research involved monitoring for high frequency (HF) microseismic activity, in the effective frequency range of 100 to 400 kHz, at an underground hardrock mine. An HF monitor was installed to record activity in and near a pillar at a depth of 2100 m near active mining stopes. Analysis of the recorded events was done in light of production blasting records, the mine-wide microseismic data set for events below a depth of 1800 m and laboratory studies conducted to assist with a general HF data analysis. Data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Saint Venan principle, the left and right sides of the finite element model are 5 times the tunnel width, and the elastoplastic model and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion are used [10][11][12] . Constrained horizontal displacement around the model, constrained vertical displacement at the bottom and a free boundary at the top.…”
Section: Model Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Saint Venan principle, the left and right sides of the finite element model are 5 times the tunnel width, and the elastoplastic model and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion are used [10][11][12] . Constrained horizontal displacement around the model, constrained vertical displacement at the bottom and a free boundary at the top.…”
Section: Model Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the mutual influence of natural vibration frequency of buildings and blast vibration frequency, cause some unexpected damage [1] . Considering the mutual influence of vibration velocity and frequency, some countries laid down blasting vibration safety standard, such as blasting vibration safety standard DIN4150 of German [2,3] (shown in table 1), the safety standard promulgated by United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) and OSMRE [4] (shown in table 2), the blasting vibration safety criteria considered both particle vibration velocity and vibration frequency , which was clearly defined in Blasting Safety Regulation GB6722-2003 [5] (shown in table 3).…”
Section: Judgment Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These laboratory measurements usually involve mounting the prepared core specimens in a pressure chamber to enable permeability and acoustic measurements at simulated in situ pressure conditions. However, current industry practice normally involves tests done under simulated overburden or hydrostatic pressures only, and recent works indicate that permeability under constant overburden pressure can vary significantly as lateral stress is varied [22][23][24][25]. Such lateral stress variations would be expected as a function of orientation in an anisotropic stress field and in response to production or stimulation procedures.…”
Section: Reservoir Permeability and Relationship To In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%