2017
DOI: 10.1785/0120170033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of Soft Deposits due to Landslide: The Mission Peak, California, Landslide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface morphology (inclination, convexity, and height) can cause amplification at both larger ridge scales and smaller site scales (Hough et al, ; Kaiser et al, ; Meunier et al, ). Several studies demonstrated amplification phenomena in slopes prone to landsliding (Del Gaudio & Wasowski, , ; Hartzell et al, ; Moore et al, ). These works show that amplification observed at different stations reveals peaks coinciding with potential sliding directions, and this implies greater slope susceptibility to seismic failure with respect to what can be estimated by conventional (pseudo‐static) slope stability analyses (Del Gaudio et al, ).…”
Section: Coseismic Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface morphology (inclination, convexity, and height) can cause amplification at both larger ridge scales and smaller site scales (Hough et al, ; Kaiser et al, ; Meunier et al, ). Several studies demonstrated amplification phenomena in slopes prone to landsliding (Del Gaudio & Wasowski, , ; Hartzell et al, ; Moore et al, ). These works show that amplification observed at different stations reveals peaks coinciding with potential sliding directions, and this implies greater slope susceptibility to seismic failure with respect to what can be estimated by conventional (pseudo‐static) slope stability analyses (Del Gaudio et al, ).…”
Section: Coseismic Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore to sum up, from here and in the light of previous studies, the best options we have to explain the observed frequencies of amplification and the measured directionality at stations on the studied ridge are (i) the topographic surface geometry; (ii) the stratigraphy; and (iii) subsurface anisotropy due to, for example, landslides, schistosity and/or fractures associated with topographic stress (Del Gaudio et al, 2008;Formisano et al, 2012;Pischiutta and Rovelli, 2014;Hailemikael et al, 2016;Hartzell et al, 2017;Stolte et al, 2017;Assimaki and Mohammadi, 2018). These possible explanations should be tested with detailed numerical models.…”
Section: Amplification Of Ground Motion and Potential Dominant Directionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, during the first stage of the long run-out, i.e., the ejection of the sliding mass, the dynamic response was also influenced by the inertia seismic force because of the initial acceleration of the sliding mass. In fact, as for formation mechanism of earthquake-induced landslides, lots of researches are conducted and many results are obtained in these years (Keefer 2002;Chigira et al 2003;Biondi et al 2004;Chernouss et al 2006;Chigira and Yagi 2006;Meunier et al 2008;Jibson 2011;Strenk and Wartman 2011;Meunier et al 2013;Del Gaudio et al 2014;Gorum et al 2014;Rizzitano et al 2014;West et al 2014;Gallen et al 2015;Basharat et al 2016;Fan et al 2016;Grant et al 2016;Saade et al 2016;Chang et al 2017;Croissant et al 2017;Hartzell et al 2017;Hu et al 2018;Nowicki Jessee et al 2018;Roback et al 2018;Fan et al 2019). Among these results, such factors as local topography, lithology, rock mass structure & tectonics, ground water and seismic force were fully discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%