2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-021-00282-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of circular reinforced concrete columns subjected to compression, bending and torsion with low and moderate shear span ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The premise of the condition assessment is to accurately evaluate the post‐earthquake damage to bridge structures. For assessing post‐earthquake damage to bridges, the bridge column is the critical component that affects the safety performance of the whole bridge 27–29 . The types of post‐earthquake damage to the column can be mainly divided into shear damage, bending damage, and torsional damage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The premise of the condition assessment is to accurately evaluate the post‐earthquake damage to bridge structures. For assessing post‐earthquake damage to bridges, the bridge column is the critical component that affects the safety performance of the whole bridge 27–29 . The types of post‐earthquake damage to the column can be mainly divided into shear damage, bending damage, and torsional damage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For assessing post-earthquake damage to bridges, the bridge column is the critical component that affects the safety performance of the whole bridge. [27][28][29] The types of post-earthquake damage to the column can be mainly divided into shear damage, bending damage, and torsional damage. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the damage type of the column according to the principal direction of the damage and then evaluate the related damage.…”
Section: Post-earthquake Assessment Of the Safety Risk Level Of Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deep‐buried stations, the soil arch effects prevented further increases in vertical compressions applied to subway stations as the buried depth increased 42 . The gravity analyses indicated that the soil arch did not form in the shallow‐buried station models, which had a maximum buried depth of 4.8 m. The medium or high shear span‐to‐depth ratio would weaken the influence of the shear effect, which led to the flexural failure rather than the shear failure of columns 43 . For safety reasons, columns of a relatively high shear span‐to‐depth ratio were designed to ensure the ductile rather than brittle failure of column specimens.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Station and Soil Domainmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…42 The gravity analyses indicated that the soil arch did not form in the shallow-buried station models, which had a maximum buried depth of 4.8 m. The medium or high shear span-to-depth ratio would weaken the influence of the shear effect, which led to the flexural failure rather than the shear failure of columns. 43 For safety reasons, columns of a relatively high shear span-to-depth ratio were designed to ensure the ductile rather than brittle failure of column specimens. The shear span-to-depth ratio of tested columns was prescribed as 7.25.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methodologies and applications regarding the seismic assessment of existing RC buildings can be found in the national and international literature, aiming to investigate the different problematic aspects of this task, such as the choice of the proper modeling strategy and analysis methodology [1][2][3][4][5] and the consideration of the different source of uncertainties in the modeling phase [6][7][8]. Moreover, different studies evaluate the structural damage in the existing RC structures as consequence of displacements induced by landslides [9][10][11][12][13] or other hazard sources, such as subsidence [14,15], ground consolidation [16], mining activities [17], excavations [18], and variations in the temperature distribution in the structural elements [19], monitored through satellite data for consistent time intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%