2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0491-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic fragility and risk assessment of high-speed railway continuous-girder bridge under track constraint effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Other methodologies consider the track constraint effect on seismic fragility of railway bridges, identifying critical components for every case. 38 Bearings were found to be the most vulnerable component and bridge piers the less vulnerable one 33,37 ; however, these conclusions are strongly case-dependent and different for the track constraint effect is considered. Seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridges is proposed by Salcher et al 39 for ballasted steel bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 Other methodologies consider the track constraint effect on seismic fragility of railway bridges, identifying critical components for every case. 38 Bearings were found to be the most vulnerable component and bridge piers the less vulnerable one 33,37 ; however, these conclusions are strongly case-dependent and different for the track constraint effect is considered. Seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridges is proposed by Salcher et al 39 for ballasted steel bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several methodologies consider all critical components for the estimation of railway bridge fragility, proposing a generic damage measure to describe the system damage, ignoring VBI 37 . Other methodologies consider the track constraint effect on seismic fragility of railway bridges, identifying critical components for every case 38 . Bearings were found to be the most vulnerable component and bridge piers the less vulnerable one 33,37 ; however, these conclusions are strongly case‐dependent and different for the track constraint effect is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al (2018b, 2018c) investigated the effects of ground motion characteristics on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous HSR track-bridge system and concluded that the vertical part of ground motions should be carefully considered in seismic design of HSR track-bridge systems. Cui et al (2019) did a numerical study on the risk assessment of HSR continuous girder bridge considering the effect of track constraint and found that a bridge without considering the track system is prone to be damaged compared to that with considering the track system. Kang et al (2017) and Jiang et al (2019) conducted a series of shaking table tests on a 1/12-scaled HSR bridge with CRTS-II track system to evaluate the seismic responses of bridge components subjected to different intensities of earthquake excitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that bridge structures can present structural damage after seismic loading, some authors propose methodologies to estimate safety levels in bridges expressed in terms of fragility curves: Choi and Jeon (2003) evaluates the fragility of bridges and retrofit measures to increase the seismic resistance of the bridge structures; Kim and Feng (2003) estimates fragility curves considering different intensity measures; fragility curves are calculated in different kinds of bridges and zones in the United States (Choi et al 2004;Pan et al 2007); analytical fragility analysis is proposed for different components of the bridge structure (Padgett and DesRoches 2008). Wang et al (2012) estimates fragility curves considering multidimensional performance limit state parameters in concrete bridges; a multivariate fragility analysis is made considering the uncertainties in the seismic loadings (Wang et al 2018); the effect of the cumulative damage by seismic loadings is taken into account in the fragility analysis (Cui et al 2019;Panchireddi and Ghosh 2019;Tolentino et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%