2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic anisotropy in the Sumatra subduction zone

Abstract: [1] An important tool for understanding deformation occurring within a subduction zone is the measurement of seismic anisotropy through observations of shear wave splitting (SWS). In Sumatra, two temporary seismic networks were deployed between December 2007 and February 2009, covering the fore arc between the fore-arc islands to the back arc. We use SKS and local SWS measurements to determine the type, amount, and location of anisotropy. Local SWS measurements from the fore-arc islands exhibit trench-parallel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
41
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(204 reference statements)
8
41
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this region shows more measurements that indicate an anisotropic layer. This result is similar to the finding of studies by Hammond et al (2010) and Collings et al (2013) which show that there is a thick anisotropic layer on overriding plate which is related to parallel fault layers. It is assumed that there is only one anisotropic layer beneath the Sumatra Backarc that is a subduction plate which is located beneath the Sumatra Backarc.…”
Section: Back-arc Regionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this region shows more measurements that indicate an anisotropic layer. This result is similar to the finding of studies by Hammond et al (2010) and Collings et al (2013) which show that there is a thick anisotropic layer on overriding plate which is related to parallel fault layers. It is assumed that there is only one anisotropic layer beneath the Sumatra Backarc that is a subduction plate which is located beneath the Sumatra Backarc.…”
Section: Back-arc Regionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The shear-wave splitting measurement shows that the duration of the delay time is about 0.6 -1.4 s. This region shows the same result as those in the Sumatra Fault; that is a dominant polarization direction is parallel faults. This study also shows the same finding as that of by Collings et al (2013) which shows that in the region of the Sumatra Backarc, the dominant polarization direction is parallel with the Sumatra Fault. This region shows more fair duration compared to that in the Sumatra Fault showing a deformation from an extensive shift to the continental lithosphere.…”
Section: Back-arc Regionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting average δt is slightly smaller than the average value (1.25 s) from oceanic islands calculated by Király et al () from the Global Splitting Database (http://www.gm.univ-montp2.fr/splitting/) (Wustefeld et al, ) but which is in reasonable agreement with previous local studies, for example, 0.90 ± 0.14 s in the southernmost Indochina Peninsula (Yu et al, ), ∼1 s in the Sumatra wedge (specifically, measurements are made for the stations located above the 150‐km slab contour) (Hammond et al, ), and 0.34–1.08 s in the Banda wedge measured from local S splitting (Di Leo et al, ). The larger δt (of 1.6–2.4 s in Sumatra, Collings et al, ; ∼1.6 s in Java, Hammond et al, ; and 1.13–1.38 s in Banda, Di Leo et al, ) has been primarily attributed to subslab mantle flow, rather than the flow in the mantle wedge, and the larger δt all comes from SKS splitting measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%