1990
DOI: 10.1057/ori.1990.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmenting the simulation software market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the variety of criteria applied to evaluate the features of simulation software, and the fact that there are no standards to evaluate it [1], some researchers [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] have proposed a list of features to evaluate simulation software. These criteria range from abstract features such as "good quality" to specific features such as "graphics-animation capability".…”
Section: Manufacturing Simulation Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the variety of criteria applied to evaluate the features of simulation software, and the fact that there are no standards to evaluate it [1], some researchers [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] have proposed a list of features to evaluate simulation software. These criteria range from abstract features such as "good quality" to specific features such as "graphics-animation capability".…”
Section: Manufacturing Simulation Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have revealed that although some of the participants are aware of the significant set-up costs and the need for learning new software and new methodology, most of them have agreed that visual interactive modelling provides enhanced interaction with decision makers, more useful and easier-tounderstand models, and better decisions. Van Breedam, et al [6], have conducted a survey in order to evaluate several simulation software tools.…”
Section: User Surveys On Simulation Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Breedam, et al [6], have conducted a survey in order to evaluate several simulation software tools.…”
Section: User Surveys On Simulation Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos investigadores tal como Banks (Banks 1991, Banks, Aviles, McLaughlin & Yuan 1991, Banks 1996, Banks et al 2001), Breedam (Breedam, Raes & Velde 1990), Davis (Davis & Williams 1994), Holder (Holder 1990), Kochlar (Kochhar 1989), Law (Law & Haider 1989, Law & Kelton 1991, A.M.Law & McGomas 1992, Mackulak (Mackulak, Savory & Cochran 1994), Hlupic (Hlupic 1997, Hlupic & Paul 1995a, Hlupic & Paul 1995b), Kuljis (Kuljis 1996), Nikoukaran (Nikoukaran, Hulpic & Paul 1999), y Baldwin et al (Baldwin, Eldabi, Hlupic & Irani 2000) han propuesto varios criterios para la evaluación de programas de simulación desde distintos puntos de vista y niveles de abstracción.…”
Section: Características De Las Herramientas De Simulaciónunclassified
“…Los criterios varían en cuanto al agrupamiento de característi-cas, ya que depende del nivel de abstracción elegido para la evaluación. Entre las criterios más representativos podemos mencionar el de Law y Haider (Law & Haider 1989), Law y McComas (Law & McComas 1999), Kochhar (Kochhar 1989), Holder (Holder 1990), Breedam et al (Breedam et al 1990), Banks et al (Banks et al 1991) , Kelton y Law (Law & Kelton 1991), Davis y Wiliams (Davis & Williams 1994), Banks (Banks 1996) y Maklulak (Mackulak et al 1994). Nikoukaran en su interés por proponer una visión más amplia con respecto a las características ideales para una herramienta de simulación, agrupa los criterios propuestos por dichos investigadores haciendoénfasis en aquellas en las que coinciden ) y Banks et al(Banks et al 2001.…”
Section: Criterios De Evaluación Del Entorno En La Fase De Simulaciónunclassified