2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-019-09877-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmenting Chinese Gamblers Based on Gambling Forms: A Latent Class Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, these players are less interested or responsive to a personal contact. Lottery players as a group also have less problem gambling severity (Nong et al 2020 ), and perhaps have less need to reduce their expenditures. Further research that includes a measure of problem severity for high expenditure players would provide a more nuanced interpretation of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps, these players are less interested or responsive to a personal contact. Lottery players as a group also have less problem gambling severity (Nong et al 2020 ), and perhaps have less need to reduce their expenditures. Further research that includes a measure of problem severity for high expenditure players would provide a more nuanced interpretation of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research on RG has targeted measures developed for specific gambling forms (e.g., installing certain RG features on EGMs). A recent study found three distinct segments among gambling customers in Macau, and members of the casino gambling group were more likely to report symptoms of gambling disorder than the lottery and sociable gambler group members, suggesting a need for different interventions for different subtypes of gamblers (Nong et al 2020 ). Studies of the differential effects of specific RG measures on different subtypes of gamblers are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 14 studies included indicate that women who gambled prefer non-strategic types of gambling (bingo, lottery, scratch cards), whereas men who gamble prefer more strategic games (casino games, horse race and sports betting) ( Bonnaire et al, 2017 ; Leung & Tsang, 2011 ; Lopez-Gonzalez, Russell, Hing, Estévez, & Griffiths, 2020 ; Nong, Fong, Fong, & Lam, 2020 ; Nower & Blaszczynski, 2006 ; Odlaug et al, 2011 ; Potenza et al, 2006 ; Ronzitti et al, 2016 ; Stevens & Young, 2010 ; Svensson & Romild, 2014 ; Toneatto & Wang, 2009 ; van der Maas et al, 2018 ; Williams et al, 2013 ). However, age may be an important confounding factor as younger age is associated with a preference for strategic games and men who gamble tend to start gambling earlier ( Bonnaire et al, 2017 ; Odlaug et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this study is related to a gambling destination, five measurable items are added for reflecting the image of the gambling destination. These adjectives are greedy-contented (Horch and Hodgins, 2013 ; Hing and Russell, 2017 ; Miller and Thomas, 2017 ), uncontrolled-controlled (Miller and Thomas, 2017 ; Nong et al, 2020 ), selfish-generous (Ohtsuka and Chan, 2009 ; Miller and Thomas, 2017 ; Brown and Russell, 2020 ), relaxed-stressed (Kneesel et al, 2010 ; Wong and Rosenbaum, 2012 ; Ma and Lai, 2016 ), and lucky-unlucky (Lee et al, 2006 ; Vong, 2007 ; Rodriguez et al, 2014 ). Since studies in gambling highlighted that players are greedy, uncontrolled, generous, stressed, and unlucky during gambling (Jefferson and Nicki, 2003 ; Ohtsuka and Chan, 2009 ; Ferentzy and Turner, 2013 ; Horch and Hodgins, 2013 ; Miller and Thomas, 2017 ; Brown and Russell, 2020 ), these five adjectives are included in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%