2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-007-0073-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of the temporalis muscle from MR data

Abstract: Objective A method for segmenting the temporalis from magnetic resonance (MR) images was developed and tested. The temporalis muscle is one of the muscles of mastication which plays a major role in the mastication system. Materials and methods The temporalis region of interest (ROI) and the head ROI are defined in reference images, from which the spatial relationship between the two ROIs is derived. This relationship is used to define the temporalis ROI in a study image. Range-constrained thresholding is then … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our technique produced generally better segmentation than previous approaches for the same muscle: previous models achieved DSC of 0.86 for masticatory muscles [44], 0.826 and 0.788 for masseter and temporalis [17] and 0.902 for temporalis [16], compared to DSC of 0.893 in this study. Our DSC is also comparable to previous models for segmentation of other muscles, for example, abdominal (DSC 0.90-0.97) [20][21][22][23][24], thigh (DSC 0.90-0.97) [18,19] and shoulder (DSC 0.71-0.88) [26,27]; our precision and recall of 0.867 and 0.926 is comparable to 0.93 and 0.91 for abdominal muscle [20]; and our HD of 1.889 mm is better than an existing model for masticatory muscles (8.2 mm) [44] as well as those for thigh (2.3-8.2 mm) [18] and lumbar abdominal (4.6-7.9 mm) muscles [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our technique produced generally better segmentation than previous approaches for the same muscle: previous models achieved DSC of 0.86 for masticatory muscles [44], 0.826 and 0.788 for masseter and temporalis [17] and 0.902 for temporalis [16], compared to DSC of 0.893 in this study. Our DSC is also comparable to previous models for segmentation of other muscles, for example, abdominal (DSC 0.90-0.97) [20][21][22][23][24], thigh (DSC 0.90-0.97) [18,19] and shoulder (DSC 0.71-0.88) [26,27]; our precision and recall of 0.867 and 0.926 is comparable to 0.93 and 0.91 for abdominal muscle [20]; and our HD of 1.889 mm is better than an existing model for masticatory muscles (8.2 mm) [44] as well as those for thigh (2.3-8.2 mm) [18] and lumbar abdominal (4.6-7.9 mm) muscles [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Automated methods have been developed for muscle segmentation, including thresholding, fuzzy c-means clustering, atlas/ registration-based methods and shape prior modelling. One study applied range-constrained thresholding and adaptive morphological operations to segment temporalis [16], while another used Markov random field approach and region growing [17]. However, these have shortcomings: thresholding may fail when neighbouring tissues have similar intensity (as with facial muscles), atlas/ registration-based methods require high computational resources and substantial time to segment each case and can fail to locate complex facial muscle structures with sufficient precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ng et al [27][28][29] have tested several methods for FST segmentation using prior knowledge. The process starts with manual segmentation of the training sets.…”
Section: Facial Soft Tissue Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modeling method for muscles in the crural area was then proposed for analysis of their motor function in MR images [6]. A recognition method for the temporal muscle was proposed for surgical planning and analysis of loss of the mastication function [7]. These two methods, however, were used for MR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%