2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07111-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and texture descriptors

Abstract: Fully automated and volumetric segmentation of critical tumors may play a crucial role in diagnosis and surgical planning. One of the most challenging tumor segmentation tasks is localization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Exclusive application of conventional methods does not appear promising. Deep learning approaches has achieved great success in the computer aided diagnosis, especially in biomedical image segmentation. This paper introduces a framework based on convolutional neural network (CNN… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas major progress has been made for automatic segmentation of the whole pancreas, 24 fully automated and volumetric segmentation of pancreatic tumors is still challenging with insufficient similarity indexes or Dice scores. 25…”
Section: Image and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas major progress has been made for automatic segmentation of the whole pancreas, 24 fully automated and volumetric segmentation of pancreatic tumors is still challenging with insufficient similarity indexes or Dice scores. 25…”
Section: Image and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data type a [21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]34,36,40,42,44] 14 (47) Radiology images [18,19,22,23,32,33,35,[37][38][39]41,43] 12 (40) Clinical data [16,17,20,23,32,35,39,41…”
Section: References Studies N (%) Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation approach a [18,[20][21][22]28,31,33,37,38,40] 10 (33) External validation [16,17,19,[23][24][25]28,34,35,37,39] 10 (33) K-fold cross-validation [19,22,39,41,43] 5 (17) Hold-out cross-validation [31,35] 2 (7) Leave-one-out cross-validation [29] 1 (3) Shuffle-split cross-validation [26,32,36,42] 4 (13) Not reported…”
Section: References Studies N (%) Validation and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations