2014
DOI: 10.1021/mz500252f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmental Dynamics of Polymer Melts with Spherical Nanoparticles

Abstract: The impact of spherical nanoparticles (NPs) on the segmental dynamics of polymer melts is investigated. The addition of NPs broadens the segmental dynamics with effects of both particle size and loading. Interfacial bound layer thickness is calculated by the difference in magnitude of the segmental dynamics of pure polymer and nanocomposites. These theoretical models suggest that the bound layer thickness in the case of strongly adsorbing polymer matrices may increase with particle size.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
143
1
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
143
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar values can be compatible with our results and the above models about polymer chain conformations (Scheme 1) of the bound polymer layer(s), taking into consideration that the length of Kuhn segment for a PDMS in melt is $1.56 nm [72]. However, the geometrical models employed previously for the estimation of interfacial layer thickness [8,9,15] cannot not be employed here, due to the high degree of initial particles aggregation [17], the not well defined shape of aggregates (SEM images in [17]), and the significant intraparticle porosity [36]. Nevertheless, we may calculate the 'apparent' interfacial layer thickness in our core-shell nanocomposites from the fraction of interfacial polymer, estimated above, and the specific surface area of the oxide sample before polymer adsorption, S BET , determined by nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements (Table 1).…”
Section: Interpretation In Terms Of Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar values can be compatible with our results and the above models about polymer chain conformations (Scheme 1) of the bound polymer layer(s), taking into consideration that the length of Kuhn segment for a PDMS in melt is $1.56 nm [72]. However, the geometrical models employed previously for the estimation of interfacial layer thickness [8,9,15] cannot not be employed here, due to the high degree of initial particles aggregation [17], the not well defined shape of aggregates (SEM images in [17]), and the significant intraparticle porosity [36]. Nevertheless, we may calculate the 'apparent' interfacial layer thickness in our core-shell nanocomposites from the fraction of interfacial polymer, estimated above, and the specific surface area of the oxide sample before polymer adsorption, S BET , determined by nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements (Table 1).…”
Section: Interpretation In Terms Of Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The properties of interfacial polymer may affect significantly or even dominate the behavior of the whole system [14]. Kumar and coworkers have demonstrated that the interfacial layer thickness in the case of strongly adsorbing polymers may increase with particle size [15] and decrease with curvature of the nanoparticles (Ref. 7 in [15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These adsorbed chains form an dynamic interfacial layer (DIL), which has distinct segmental mobility and other properties [7,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and is believed to directly correlate with many advanced macroscopic properties of PNCs [3,5]. However, despite the recent intensive discussions on the features of the DIL [18,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28], many of its characteristics, especially the basic relationship between the interfacial layer chain packing and the dynamics, are still missing. This strongly hinders our understanding of various phenomena in PNCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding silica nanoparticles to PVAc leads to several changes in the dielectric spectra (Fig.1) [15,[21][22][23]: (i) the α-relaxation peak (segmental dynamics) shifts slightly to lower frequency, broadens and decreases in amplitude; (ii) an additional contribution appears on the low-frequency side (α'-peak); (iii) the Maxwell-Wagner-Sillar's (MWS) polarization process appears at even lower frequency; and (iv) the conductivity changes. The α'-process, corresponding to the segmental dynamics in the interfacial layer [21,23] which was not resolved in previous studies [15,[21][22][23], is now clearly visible especially in the derivative spectra, ε' der (ω) = -π/2*∂ε'(ω)/∂ln(ω) (Fig.S2 in SM [33]), and the relaxation time distribution analysis (Fig.1b) (for details of this analysis see Ref. [41] and SM [33]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%