2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface modification and thermal annealing on the interfacial dynamics in core–shell nanocomposites based on silica and adsorbed PDMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
89
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(211 reference statements)
14
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently showed [19] that surface modification of low specific surface area fumed silica (58 m 2 /g) with small zirconia nanoparticles resulted in slightly increased S and in faster and more cooperative interfacial relaxation, these effects suggesting an increase of PDMSeparticle contact points, in qualitative agreement with effects obtained here with S and a int of the NCs. Finally, the adequacy of the model proposed above was examined, additionally, in our recent work [27] in similar systems of silica/PDMS by means of (a) surface modification of silica of initially high S (342 m 2 /g) with zirconia nanoparticles resulting in strongly suppressed S and (b) thermal (crystallization) annealing, the results for interfacial polymer being in qualitative agreement with those obtained in the present study. A term often employed for the description of the range [2,10] of polymerefiller interactions is the distance from the particles' surface, up to which the characteristics of interfacial (modified) polymer dominate, in other words, the thickness of the interfacial layer [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We have recently showed [19] that surface modification of low specific surface area fumed silica (58 m 2 /g) with small zirconia nanoparticles resulted in slightly increased S and in faster and more cooperative interfacial relaxation, these effects suggesting an increase of PDMSeparticle contact points, in qualitative agreement with effects obtained here with S and a int of the NCs. Finally, the adequacy of the model proposed above was examined, additionally, in our recent work [27] in similar systems of silica/PDMS by means of (a) surface modification of silica of initially high S (342 m 2 /g) with zirconia nanoparticles resulting in strongly suppressed S and (b) thermal (crystallization) annealing, the results for interfacial polymer being in qualitative agreement with those obtained in the present study. A term often employed for the description of the range [2,10] of polymerefiller interactions is the distance from the particles' surface, up to which the characteristics of interfacial (modified) polymer dominate, in other words, the thickness of the interfacial layer [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar conflicting results to those reported above for the interphase in PNCs can also be found for thin polymer films . It has been reported that such controversies are not only related to compositional variations but also dependent on the method of preparation and the experimental technique employed . Therefore, a systematic characterization of polymer–nanoparticle interactions is of great theoretical importance, as it can provide a way to control the interfacial polymeric structure with the goal of optimizing the desirable properties of PNCs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…There has been considerable interest in characterizing polymer chains within the interphases, since it underpins the advantageous physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) . Despite many reports on the interfacial polymer, a comprehensive model that describes the quantitative relationship between the microstructure of the interphase and the macroscopic properties of nanocomposites is still lacking. Such a model could be essential to the design and application of nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors [24], long molecules form loops-like structures with contacts on each curl of the polymer spiral. According to another report [19], the immobilized molecules form linear tails directed from the silica surface at the initial stage of adsorption (chemisorption), which bend into a helix with a further increase in the concentration of the adsorbate. Both theories suggest a monolayer forming of new adsorption sites at some distance from the surface, which reduces the conformational stresses on the next step of modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, bulk dynamics (glass transition temperature-T g , and time scale of a relaxation) were not significantly affected. This effect has been widely studied [16][17][18][19], and authors proposed a model of bimodal conformations of polymers adsorbed on solid surfaces, in terms of an increase in the apparent thickness of the interfacial layer with increasing surface roughness. According to this model, the conformations of polymer chains during the first stage of adsorption are mostly linear (tails) with following formation of loop-like structures with polymer content increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%