2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seedling Defoliation and Drought Stress: Variation in Intensity and Frequency Affect Performance and Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was expected as plant performance in young stages might have limited implications on plant performance after transition from the vegetative to the generative phase. Similar trends were observed for salinity tolerance in wheatgrass 66 or tolerance to defoliation intensity in maize 67 . Additionally, Gibert et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This finding was expected as plant performance in young stages might have limited implications on plant performance after transition from the vegetative to the generative phase. Similar trends were observed for salinity tolerance in wheatgrass 66 or tolerance to defoliation intensity in maize 67 . Additionally, Gibert et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Considering the phylogenetic diversity represented (10 species from 10 plant families) and the range in growth form and habitat types, variation across species is not surprising. Consistent with other studies (Denton et al, 2018;Eziz et al, 2017;Larson & Funk, 2016;Lucas et al, 2013), seedling drought induced a shift in root/shoot ratio in some species, and drought tolerance was positively linked to root/shoot ratio across species. In the four species demonstrating phenotypic plasticity, root/shoot ratios were higher in plants in the drought groups compared with that of control plants, as predicted by adaptive plasticity of organs to maximize uptake of limited resources (Denton et al, 2018;Larson & Funk, 2016;Lucas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with other studies (Denton et al, 2018;Eziz et al, 2017;Larson & Funk, 2016;Lucas et al, 2013), seedling drought induced a shift in root/shoot ratio in some species, and drought tolerance was positively linked to root/shoot ratio across species. In the four species demonstrating phenotypic plasticity, root/shoot ratios were higher in plants in the drought groups compared with that of control plants, as predicted by adaptive plasticity of organs to maximize uptake of limited resources (Denton et al, 2018;Larson & Funk, 2016;Lucas et al, 2013). Greater investment in roots enhances drought tolerance through greater access to water as well as greater storage, likely leading to enhanced non-structural carbohydrate reserves that can function in osmoregulation to maintain water uptake (O'Brien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Type II sum of square ANOVAs were speci ed for models that included seed mass as an added covariate. The magnitude of the variance explained by the cone-warming xed effect was estimated by Cohen's Local f 2 , which is suitable for use with mixed models for which denominator degrees of freedom must be approximated, and is suitable for use with unbalanced experimental designs [34,35]. Input for the calculation of Cohen's Local f 2 includes marginal R 2 goodness-of-t values both from models with and without the factor of interest, as follows:…”
Section: Common Garden Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in this study the warming treatment was present in the R 2 with model and omitted from the R 2 without model. Cohen's Local f 2 effect sizes ≥ 0.02, ≥ 0.15, and ≥ 0.35 are respectively considered small, medium, and large [36,35]. Code and data related to this work are accessible through the Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity.…”
Section: Common Garden Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%