1999
DOI: 10.3354/meps176139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentary metal bioavailability determined by the digestive constraints of marine deposit feeders:gut retention time and dissolved amino acids

Abstract: Contaminant metals bound to sediments are subject to considerable solubilization during passage of the sediments through the digestive systems of deposit feeders. We examined the kinetics of this process, using digestive fluids extracted from deposit feeders Arenicola manna and Parastichopus californicus and then incubated with contaminated sediments. Kinetics are complex, with solubilization followed occasionally by readsorption onto the sediment. In general, solubilization kinetics are biphasic, with an init… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
57
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissolution of a contaminated substrate will make the associated contaminant more available for uptake, thereby explaining the higher bioaccumulation of Cd and PBDE in the Tetraselmis treatment. In a situation when ingested OM is incompletely dissolved during gut passage (as probably to a large extent is the case for lignin and sedimentary OM) contaminant dissolution and subsequent bioavailability will depend on a competition between dissolved solubilizing agents in the gut fluid and the binding strength of the particulate ingested substrates (Chen and Mayer, 1999). Thus, a higher affinity of Cd to ingested sediment than to ingested lignin could result in different bioavailability and subsequent bioaccumulation of Cd from these OM sources.…”
Section: The Role Of Organic Matter For Bioaccumulation Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The dissolution of a contaminated substrate will make the associated contaminant more available for uptake, thereby explaining the higher bioaccumulation of Cd and PBDE in the Tetraselmis treatment. In a situation when ingested OM is incompletely dissolved during gut passage (as probably to a large extent is the case for lignin and sedimentary OM) contaminant dissolution and subsequent bioavailability will depend on a competition between dissolved solubilizing agents in the gut fluid and the binding strength of the particulate ingested substrates (Chen and Mayer, 1999). Thus, a higher affinity of Cd to ingested sediment than to ingested lignin could result in different bioavailability and subsequent bioaccumulation of Cd from these OM sources.…”
Section: The Role Of Organic Matter For Bioaccumulation Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the contaminants were added in the same OM treatment and with the assumption that the animals have the same feeding behavior in each experimental core, there must be differences in uptake routes and sorption capacities between the organic matter and cadmium and BDE-99. This is possibly an indication of differences in solubilization capacity of Cd and PBDE by Macoma digestive fluid in combination with the binding strength of the substrates (sensu Chen and Mayer, 1999). Moreover, Macoma differs from the other two species in their assimilation of organic matter (Decho and Luoma, 1996) and their ability to sort particles in their gills, where some particles are rejected and excreted as pseudo-feces (Decho and Luoma, 1991).…”
Section: The Role Of Organic Matter For Bioaccumulation Of Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Benthic deposit feeders secrete digestive agents such as hydrolytic enzymes and surfactants to hydrolyze and solubilize absorbable food items from sediments (Mayer et al 1997). Digestive fluids of deposit feeders contain high concentrations of various dissolved organic compounds that can serve as ligands for binding and solubilizing metals (Mayer et al 1996;Chen and Mayer 1999;Chen et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%