2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013gl057906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment transport due to extreme events: The Hudson River estuary after tropical storms Irene and Lee

Abstract: [1] Tropical Storms Irene and Lee in 2011 produced intense precipitation and flooding in the U.S. Northeast, including the Hudson River watershed. Sediment input to the Hudson River was approximately 2.7 megaton, about 5 times the long-term annual average. Rather than the common assumption that sediment is predominantly trapped in the estuary, observations and model results indicate that approximately two thirds of the new sediment remained trapped in the tidal freshwater river more than 1 month after the stor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tidal asymmetries in vertical velocity and suspended-sediment profiles can also produce ETMs [9,17,18]. Although these processes tend to be most important near the head of salt, they can create ETMs in other areas where the channel geometry alters the salinity field, often called Secondary Turbidity Maxima or STMS [19][20][21][22]. Hydrodynamic forces and sediment and bed properties influence both ETMs and STMs, and because these factors vary with time and in all three spatial dimensions, they are difficult to study using field measurements alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal asymmetries in vertical velocity and suspended-sediment profiles can also produce ETMs [9,17,18]. Although these processes tend to be most important near the head of salt, they can create ETMs in other areas where the channel geometry alters the salinity field, often called Secondary Turbidity Maxima or STMS [19][20][21][22]. Hydrodynamic forces and sediment and bed properties influence both ETMs and STMs, and because these factors vary with time and in all three spatial dimensions, they are difficult to study using field measurements alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section 5.1, the sensitivity to the sediment grain size is studied by considering a grain size of 10 Îź m (fine‐grained sediments) and 40 Îź m (relatively coarse‐grained sediments), corresponding to a settling velocities of ws=0.2 mm ¡s −1 and ws=1 mm ¡s −1 (Fredsøe & Deigaard, ), respectively. The settling velocity 0.2 mm ¡s −1 (for the first sensitivity experiment) is at the lower limit of those used for the Hudson River estuary (Ralston et al, ), and may be not typical in the Delaware estuary. Nevertheless, the sensitivity experiments aim to investigate the influence of the sediment settling velocity on the sediment transport/trapping mechanisms, and will provide useful insight into the spatial sorting of sediments of different grain‐sizes observed in many estuaries.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Sediment Grain Size and River Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Intense rainfall from the storm resulted in record flooding and sediment mobilization in the U.S. Northeast (Ralston et al, 2013;Magilligan et al, 2015;Yellen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hurricane Irene: Synoptic History and Meteorological Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%