2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71358-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedative drugs modulate the neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of parkinsonian patients

Abstract: Microelectrode recording (MER) is often used to identify electrode location which is critical for the success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The usage of anesthesia and its’ impact on MER quality and electrode placement is controversial. We recorded neuronal activity at a single depth inside the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) before, during, and after remifentanil infusion. The root mean square (RMS) of the 250–6000 Hz band-passed signal was used to evaluate the regional spiking a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that the use of remifentanil or propofol inhibits MER signals, which seems to be different from our results [ 16 , 30 , 31 ]. However, it is worth noting that Mciver et al [ 30 ] used a bolus administration (propofol 0.3 mg/kg or remifentanil 0.05 mg/kg) and Benady et al [ 31 ] used continuous constant rate administration (propofol 50 μg/kg/min or remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min) without an objective level of consciousness assessment or local scalp anesthesia. In this study, we used an electroencephalogram monitoring-guided propofol-remifentanil TCI (1–2 μg/ml and 2–3 ng/ml, respectively) with the local scalp anesthesia regimen.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown that the use of remifentanil or propofol inhibits MER signals, which seems to be different from our results [ 16 , 30 , 31 ]. However, it is worth noting that Mciver et al [ 30 ] used a bolus administration (propofol 0.3 mg/kg or remifentanil 0.05 mg/kg) and Benady et al [ 31 ] used continuous constant rate administration (propofol 50 μg/kg/min or remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min) without an objective level of consciousness assessment or local scalp anesthesia. In this study, we used an electroencephalogram monitoring-guided propofol-remifentanil TCI (1–2 μg/ml and 2–3 ng/ml, respectively) with the local scalp anesthesia regimen.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the use of remifentanil or propofol inhibits MER signals, which seems to be different from our results [16,30,31]. However, it is worth noting that Mciver et al [30] used a bolus administration (propofol 0.3 mg/kg or remifentanil 0.05 mg/ kg) and Benady et al [31] used continuous Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Many centers employing MER-based DBS surgery prefer to perform the procedure under awake conditions to obtain reliable neurophysiological mapping and enable intraoperative test stimulation to observe the motor improvement and potential side-effects. In our recent work we have shown that anesthetic agents alter the firing characteristics of the STN, which is consistent with data obtained from previous studies [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. These findings provide important arguments to avoid the use of anesthetic drugs during DBS surgery.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Contrary to most sedatives, α 2 agonists do not have a direct gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic effect and so have a less profound effect on MER compared to the GABA-ergic drugs [ 10 , 32 ]. Remifentanil, acting mainly on the mu opioid receptor agonist, has limited effects on STN neuronal activity at low doses, though a recently published report showed a significant reduction in STN neuronal activity with doses above 0.1 µg/kg/min [ 10 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation