2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Procedural Sedation on the Clinical Outcome of Microelectrode Recording Guided Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: Background: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a routine treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). DBS surgery is commonly performed under local anesthesia (LA) to obtain reliable microelectrode recordings. However, procedural sedation and/or analgesia (PSA) is often desirable to improve patient comfort. The impact of PSA in addition to LA on outcome is largely unknown. Therefore, we performed an observational study to assess the effect of PSA compared to LA alone during ST… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very much in keeping with the concept of personalized medicine, including a shared decision-making approach where patients are involved in making the choice for the type of surgical procedure. Nevertheless, several studies show that an MER-guide procedure could be performed safely under procedural sedation and GA, even though anesthetic agents have shown to alter firing patterns of the STN [ 4–6 ]. Importantly, while most of the debate in the literature is about asleep versus awake surgery, an equally relevant question is how the final electrode position is verified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is very much in keeping with the concept of personalized medicine, including a shared decision-making approach where patients are involved in making the choice for the type of surgical procedure. Nevertheless, several studies show that an MER-guide procedure could be performed safely under procedural sedation and GA, even though anesthetic agents have shown to alter firing patterns of the STN [ 4–6 ]. Importantly, while most of the debate in the literature is about asleep versus awake surgery, an equally relevant question is how the final electrode position is verified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermediate solutions have also been considered. Specifically, some studies show that MER can be used under GA or procedural sedation [ 4–6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention to detail in titrating the patient to the right level of sedation is perhaps as important as the actual choice of sedative. Indeed, the choice of sedative drug has not been shown to make a difference in clinical outcomes [34,35].…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention to detail in titrating the patient to the right level of sedation is perhaps as important as the actual choice of sedative. Indeed, the choice of sedative drug has not been shown to make a difference in clinical outcomes [34, 35]. Regardless of the sedation technique, patient comfort and safety can be enhanced through careful positioning, keeping the patient warm and reassured, avoiding unnecessary bladder catheterisation and maintaining close communication during the procedure.…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LA and/or CS are preferred, and asleep-awake-asleep (AAA) using dexmedetomidine (DEX) is the most commonly used anaesthetic method among clinical centres due to its obvious benefits. Continuous infusion of DEX has been successfully used for DBS under AAA anaesthesia 16–18. DEX is a highly selective alpha-2-adrenoreceptor agonist, and it produces dose-dependent sedation without respiratory depression 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%