Salish Languages and Linguistics 1998
DOI: 10.1515/9783110801255.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secwepemc (Shuswap) tree names: key to the past?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This diversity of plant resources in subalpine forests adds support, in the form of contemporary ecological evidence, to the importance and practice of a “seasonal round,” where Indigenous stewardship practices create “patches of resources distributed over both time and space” (Peacock et al, 2016, p. 196). Turner et al (2016, p. 9) describe how, as part of this seasonal round in Secwepemcúl̓ecw, “families traveled around their territories in a patterned seasonal round, stopping and camping, sometimes for weeks at a time … to harvest and preserve the meat, roots, berries, and other resources they needed for year round living.” The Secwépemc seasonal round and calendar (Ignace, 2014) traces these plant resources throughout the year, from Pesll7éwten , the “melting month” (April), when the first plant shoots come out and early root plants are dug, through Pelltqelqél'tkemc , “getting ripe month” (July to early August), when numerous berries ripen and people harvest medicines in the high plateau, to Pesqelqlélten , the “many salmon month” (August to early September), when berries are harvested at higher elevations. However, as indicated above, the quantitative metrics of species richness, cover, or diversity do not indicate quality or condition, as defined by resource users (e.g., medicinal properties, suitability as construction material, and berry production and taste), of these plants following fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity of plant resources in subalpine forests adds support, in the form of contemporary ecological evidence, to the importance and practice of a “seasonal round,” where Indigenous stewardship practices create “patches of resources distributed over both time and space” (Peacock et al, 2016, p. 196). Turner et al (2016, p. 9) describe how, as part of this seasonal round in Secwepemcúl̓ecw, “families traveled around their territories in a patterned seasonal round, stopping and camping, sometimes for weeks at a time … to harvest and preserve the meat, roots, berries, and other resources they needed for year round living.” The Secwépemc seasonal round and calendar (Ignace, 2014) traces these plant resources throughout the year, from Pesll7éwten , the “melting month” (April), when the first plant shoots come out and early root plants are dug, through Pelltqelqél'tkemc , “getting ripe month” (July to early August), when numerous berries ripen and people harvest medicines in the high plateau, to Pesqelqlélten , the “many salmon month” (August to early September), when berries are harvested at higher elevations. However, as indicated above, the quantitative metrics of species richness, cover, or diversity do not indicate quality or condition, as defined by resource users (e.g., medicinal properties, suitability as construction material, and berry production and taste), of these plants following fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interior Douglas-fir is a moderately shade tolerant, early to late successional tree species and is able to regenerate under a full or partial canopy in the southern interior of British Columbia. It grows throughout the territory of the Secwepemc Nation, who know it as cq•ctp, and who use its strong wood and boughs for flooring and pit cooking, the seeds and sugars for food, the needles for tea, and the pitch for medicinal salves (Turner et al, 1992). The species is a foundational tree in pure and mixed forests, where it dominates the upper canopy for centuries, and is a highly valued timber species to the forest industry (Parish et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%