2017 IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wifs.2017.8267644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security in the shell: An optical physical unclonable function made of shells of cholesteric liquid crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the initial work, experimental and theoretical, was restricted to nematic shells (orientational order only; molecules aligning along the director n) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], later efforts have focused also on smectic shells of SmA- [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and SmC-type [17] as well as cholesteric [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] shells. Thanks to advances in providing long-term stability through polymerization/polymer stabilization of LC shells [26][27][28][29], they are also emerging as a realistic basis for innovative applications, for instance in photonics and photonics-derived use cases [20,26,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35], sensing [28,36,37] or unconventional soft actuators [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the initial work, experimental and theoretical, was restricted to nematic shells (orientational order only; molecules aligning along the director n) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], later efforts have focused also on smectic shells of SmA- [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and SmC-type [17] as well as cholesteric [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] shells. Thanks to advances in providing long-term stability through polymerization/polymer stabilization of LC shells [26][27][28][29], they are also emerging as a realistic basis for innovative applications, for instance in photonics and photonics-derived use cases [20,26,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35], sensing [28,36,37] or unconventional soft actuators [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating anti-counterfeiting tags with physical unclonable functions (PUFs) into objects is a promising solution for their authentication. Ongoing research hints at future LC-based technologies that may benefit from the peculiar behavior of CLCs subject to curvature, as reported for the case of cholesteric shells and droplets with the objective of generating unclonable patterns [72][73][74] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued in [29,37], CSR arrays qualify, thanks to their intricate near-field reflection behavior, as optical physical unclonable functions (PUFs) [38,39], of great use in object authentication. Saying that arrays of CSRs are PUFs means that their near-field optical response is physically unreproducible, due to the unpredictability of the exact arrangement of the hundreds of individual CSRs in the array.…”
Section: The Working Principle Of Csrs and Their Implementation In Fiducial Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is in combination with BIM that the full value of CSR fiducials would come to fruition, embracing-first-the utility in far-field read-out for categorization based on the mass-producable fiducial marker pattern generated by all the CSR retroreflection dots connected together (figures 5(c)/(g)). Second, near-field read-out of the detailed optical response at the resolution of individual CSRs (figures 5(h)-(i)), unique to every individual CSR fiducial, would be utilized for reliable authentication [18,29,37]. Because one and the same coating, intimately bound to the carrier, combines both functions, CSR fiducials thus provide a highly valuable tool for secure verification of authenticity and easy categorization, making them the ideal physical-to-digital link for BIM.…”
Section: The Product Stage and The Need For Digital Tracing And Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%