2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1752971920000123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securityquaexistential surviving (while becoming otherwise) through performative leaps of faith

Abstract: This paper analyzes the idea of ‘ontological security’ to make three arguments: (a) that to be secure in one's being is paradoxical in the sense that to be is to survive while always becoming otherwise, (b) that to survive is to be anxious, and (c) that to get attached to such a security of one's always becoming otherwise is to engage in performative leaps of faith in the security of one's existence. This framework is used to suggest a new interpretation of the security dilemma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 35 For an application of Lacan in IR foregrounding the temporal dimension, see Solomon 2014. See also Arfi's 2020 discussion of survival as constantly performing a ‘leap of faith’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 For an application of Lacan in IR foregrounding the temporal dimension, see Solomon 2014. See also Arfi's 2020 discussion of survival as constantly performing a ‘leap of faith’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 These defense mechanisms 'kick in' in response to an ontological insecurity set on constructing a secure image of what tomorrow holds, and can make masses and elites that may otherwise have little in common unite around an ideology that relieves them from the void by providing an apocalyptic and redemptive narrative vision of possible solutions to the crisis. 11 Understanding such unconscious defense mechanisms requires an understanding of ontological security as a 'security of becoming' rather than a 'security of being' as originally understood by Giddens,12 in which the ontological insecurities people experience at times of crisis compel a 'leap in faith' 13 in terms of an imagined secure past and future that can relieve the individual from their present predicament.…”
Section: Crisis Narratives: Ontological Insecurity and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 While Arfi 2020 asserts the ‘out-of-jointness’ of time, we highlight narrative's capacity to time fragmentary experiences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%