2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-5765(00)00038-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security considerations in signal detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lyall (1998) believes a post-detection protocol could be useful with full governmental participation on an international scale, but that a communications or reply policy would be difficult to legally enforce. Sterns (2000) and Tarter (2000) agree government concerns about national security, panic or some other perceived threat from an extraterrestrial civilization may impose restrictions on the free dissemination of information or data about a detection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyall (1998) believes a post-detection protocol could be useful with full governmental participation on an international scale, but that a communications or reply policy would be difficult to legally enforce. Sterns (2000) and Tarter (2000) agree government concerns about national security, panic or some other perceived threat from an extraterrestrial civilization may impose restrictions on the free dissemination of information or data about a detection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments could become involved if classified state-of-the-art technology detects hints of extraterrestrial intelligence, or if officials conclude that the scientists are about to hit pay dirt. Under these conditions scientists could be replaced by security agents, detailed reports by highly censored news releases, and openness by secrecy [43]. Rather than being a celebratory event for everyone, the discovery could become a bargaining chip in international affairs.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress towards less violent and more risk-averse societies is evident among humans [5] and simulation experiments, among other things, suggest that cooperative, "pacifistic" civilizations tend to outcompete aggressive ones in the long run [6,7]. Furthermore, the realities of interstellar travel may very well eliminate interstellar aggression as a policy option [8,9]. Obviously, if all the ETIs possibly encountered by humans are benevolent, neutral, or unable to harm us, the question whether we would be attacked would be rendered moot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has analyzed the general logic and some specific scenarios of interstellar conflict and the risks of contacting possible ETIs (e.g. [7][8][9][10][11][12]), usually concluding that the practical problems of attacks, invasions and resource grabs would make the possibility of realistic gains dubious at best. However, to my knowledge, no prior work has analyzed the specific case of preventive first strike aimed at eliminating competitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%