Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer &Amp; Communications Security - CCS '13 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2508859.2516733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security analysis of a widely deployed locking system

Abstract: Electronic locking systems are rather new products in the physical access control market. In contrast to mechanical locking systems, they provide several convenient features such as more flexible access rights management, the possibility to revoke physical keys and the claim that electronic keys cannot be cloned as easily as their mechanical counterparts. While for some electronic locks, mechanical flaws have been found [1], only a few publications analyzed the cryptographic security of electronic locking syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the widely-held academic consensus that cryptography should be publicly documented [34,37,61], the use of proprietary cryptography has persisted across many industry verticals ranging from physical access control systems [1,57,61,64,65,67] and telecommunications [23,27,52] to machine-to-machine authentication [11,61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widely-held academic consensus that cryptography should be publicly documented [34,37,61], the use of proprietary cryptography has persisted across many industry verticals ranging from physical access control systems [1,57,61,64,65,67] and telecommunications [23,27,52] to machine-to-machine authentication [11,61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of using a smart lock system compared to a metal key system is the flexibility in managing access control for a large number of users (Weiner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%