Secured Approach towards Reactive Routing Protocols Using Triple Factor in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Belgaum, Mohammad Riyaz; Musa, Shahrulniza; Su’ud, Mazliham Mohd; Alam, Muhammad Mansoor; Soomro, Safeeullah; Alansari, Zainab

doi:10.33166/aetic.2019.02.004

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 9 shows 22% used 15 nodes, 21% used 50 nodes, 14% used 25 and 30 nodes,11% used 100 nodes,6% used 60 nodes, 3% used 12,40,45 and 200 nodes as calculate base on Table 11. The lowest number of nodes was 3 [56] used a topology size of 1000x800m 2 , and the highest one was 200 [67,75] used in VANET. Table 10 shows authors who used a fixed number of the node with fixed topology.…”

Section: Number Of Nodesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review on Parameters of Internet Gateway Discovery in MANETS

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p class="0abstract"><span lang="EN-US">Mobile ad hoc Networks researchers need to apply specific parameters in the simulation tools chosen to analyze and discuss their results. The challenge faced by multiple authors is on how to decide on the choice of particular parameters. A wrong choice could lead to a no credible result and a doubtful result by other researchers. A best practice is to follow what other authors are using as input parameters in their paper. This review analyses 72 proceeding papers and articles in different digital libraries: google scholar, IEEE Xplore, Elsevier, Springer, and snowball from 2010-2020. We present the result of our survey in this paper. We recommend the input parameters research should use base on the high utilization. Our review will also help the community in MANET and Internet gateway to improve the credibility of the input parameters.</span></p>

show abstract

Section: Number Of Nodesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Base on all the challenges mentioned above, scholars have created different protocols to improve communication in MANE. They developed proactive protocol [1], reactive protocol [2], and hybrid protocol [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on Parameters of Internet Gateway Discovery in MANETS

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ensuring Ad-Hoc network security requires satisfying many requirements [4]- [8]. One important requirement is confidentiality.…”

Section: Ad-hoc Routing Protocols Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [18] and [19] new flooding attacks prevention routing protocols have been proposed. In [20] a triple factor architecture of a secured scheme has been suggested for environments considering reactive routing protocols such AODV. In this architecture, each node computes the trust considering the direct information then verifies the reputation via gathering information from its neighboring nodes and uses a cryptographic algorithm to ensure security.…”

Section: Recent Work In Ad-hoc Network Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Detailed Security Evaluation of ARANz, ARAN and AODV Protocols

Qabajeh¹,

Qabajeh²

2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ad-Hoc networks are self-organized wireless networks. Finding a secure and efficient route leading from a specific source node to an intended destination node is one of the serious concerns in mobile Ad-Hoc networks. ARANz is one of the significant protocols that has been proposed for such networks. ARANz implements the authentication methods used with the original Authenticated Routing for Ad-Hoc Networks (ARAN) and enhance security and attain robustness by dividing the network into zones and introducing several local certificate authority servers. Using restricted directional flooding, ARANz reveals improved scalability and performance. The purpose of this paper is to discuss in details the misbehavior detection system used with ARANz protocol, along with presenting a detailed simulated security and performance evaluation of ARANz and other existing protocols. Through extensive simulation using GloMoSim simulator, a detailed security evaluation has been conducted to evaluate ARANz and compare it with the original ARAN and Ad-Hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV). Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of ARANz in discovering secure routes within quite large networks including large number of moving nodes, while retaining the minimum packet routing load. Results also prove that ARANz has superior performance regardless malicious nodes percentage conducting different types of attacks such as modification, black hole, grey hole and fabrication. Hence, ARANz can be a good choice for Ad-Hoc networks established among students on a campus or peers at a conference, where predeployment of some keys and certificates is possible.

show abstract

“…Designing a protocol that will include these criteria and give a better result in a different scenario is difficult to achieve. Various proto-cols have been proposed in the literature, such as Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) [1], Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) [2], Dynamic Manet On-demand (DYMO) [3], Ad-hoc Ondemand Multipath Distance Vector (AOMDV) [4], Multicast Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (MAODV) [5], Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) [6],…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Ad Hoc Networks scenarios and challenges in years 2015-2019

Saad

Osman

Ebedon

2021

Int. j. electr. comput. eng. syst. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) protocol performance analysis depends on the type of simulation tools, mobility models, and metrics used. These parameters' choice is crucial to researchers because it may produce an inaccurate result if it is not well chosen. The challenges researcher is facing are on the choice of these four parameters. Our survey shows an inclination to used Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector routing (AODV) for performance comparison and enhancement of it by the researcher. Network simulation 2 (NS2) was the most selected tool, but we observe a decline in its utilization in recent years. Random Waypoint Mobility model (RWPM) was the most used mobility model. We have found a high percentage of the published article did not mention the mobility models use; this will make the result difficult for performance comparison with other works. Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), End to End Delay (E2ED) were the most used metrics. Some authors have self-developed their simulation tools; the authors have also used new metrics and protocols to get a particular result based on their research objective. However, some criteria of choosing a protocol, metrics, mobility model, and simulation tool were not described, decreasing the credibility of their papers' results. Improvement needs to be done in the Ad-hoc network in terms of benchmark, acceptable scenario parameters. This survey will give the best practice to be used and some recommendations to the Ad-hoc network community.

show abstract

Secured Approach towards Reactive Routing Protocols Using Triple Factor in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Cited by 15 publications

References 16 publications

A Review on Parameters of Internet Gateway Discovery in MANETS

A Review on Parameters of Internet Gateway Discovery in MANETS

Detailed Security Evaluation of ARANz, ARAN and AODV Protocols

Review of Ad Hoc Networks scenarios and challenges in years 2015-2019

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About