IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce, 2003. CEC 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/coec.2003.1210264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure supply-chain protocols

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is given by Atallah et al (2003), who address capacity allocation and auctions-a supplier-consumer interaction rather than the peer-to-peer interaction presented in this paper. An interesting open research question concerns the potential trade-off between the use of a heuristic approach to problem solving that admits a tight security property versus a closer-to-optimal algorithm that permits data leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is given by Atallah et al (2003), who address capacity allocation and auctions-a supplier-consumer interaction rather than the peer-to-peer interaction presented in this paper. An interesting open research question concerns the potential trade-off between the use of a heuristic approach to problem solving that admits a tight security property versus a closer-to-optimal algorithm that permits data leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atallah et al have proposed Secure Supply-Chain Collaboration (SSCC) problem, and developed SSCC protocols for simple e-Auction scenarios and simple capacity-allocation problem [3]. Our secure collaborative forecasting and benchmarking can be viewed as a branch of the SSCC problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTP is responsible for enforcing owner policies on the shared information. Substantial studies have been done to address information sharing and access control in the area of collaborative design in [11,12] and supply chain in [2,13,14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%