2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-7345-3_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure Decentralized Public Key Infrastructure with Multi-signature in Blockchains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e PKI-based RDIC schemes [11,30,37] require the user to verify the certificate of the other user for authentication each time before initiating a communication. e PKI has a very high computational and communication overhead, and introducing the PKI into an RDIC scheme certainly overloads the users in terms of required computation power.…”
Section: Remote Data Integrity Checking (Rdic) Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e PKI-based RDIC schemes [11,30,37] require the user to verify the certificate of the other user for authentication each time before initiating a communication. e PKI has a very high computational and communication overhead, and introducing the PKI into an RDIC scheme certainly overloads the users in terms of required computation power.…”
Section: Remote Data Integrity Checking (Rdic) Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, the need arises for remote data integrity checking (RDIC) mechanism for FOG-CPSs. However, many RDIC schemes proposed in the literature employ ID-based cryptography (IBC) with an inherent key escrow problem [12, 26-29, 33, 34, 40] or depend on public key infrastructure (PKI) for key management, which is expensive [11,30,37]. Certificateless cryptography (CLPKC)-based RDIC schemes overcome the drawbacks of IBC and PKI mechanisms.…”
Section: Remote Data Integrity Checking (Rdic) Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation