Challenges for European Innovation Policy 2011
DOI: 10.4337/9780857935212.00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sectoral Innovation Modes and Level of Economic Development: Implications for Innovation Policy in the New Member States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsic differences were recognized as being dominant in the European Union in [93], which asks for policies to increase R&D spending, improve intellectual Property rights, and favoring foreign direct investment (FDI). The findings of this study are in line with findings in [94], where the structural effects have the greatest influence on R&D spending in the top performing countries in this analysis (and the opposite is true for the worst performers). They are also in line with [95], where it was found that Germany is experiencing a structural change towards technology-intense industries, whereas Denmark, Austria, and Sweden have experienced changes in the intrinsic effects.…”
Section: Checking For Robustnesssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intrinsic differences were recognized as being dominant in the European Union in [93], which asks for policies to increase R&D spending, improve intellectual Property rights, and favoring foreign direct investment (FDI). The findings of this study are in line with findings in [94], where the structural effects have the greatest influence on R&D spending in the top performing countries in this analysis (and the opposite is true for the worst performers). They are also in line with [95], where it was found that Germany is experiencing a structural change towards technology-intense industries, whereas Denmark, Austria, and Sweden have experienced changes in the intrinsic effects.…”
Section: Checking For Robustnesssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the decomposition of R&D expenditure and employment should be done in a formal analysis. In this regard, [22][23][24] discuss in detail the issues of using total R&D expenditure in research due to business R&D (BERD) being heavily affected by the industrial structure of each country. Furthermore, obtaining information from sector disaggregation is important from a private research (private business sector R&D) perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, recent studies have shown this vector of influence in different investment contexts, specifically the contributions of Coad (2008;2011), Reinstaller and Unterlass (2012), Hall, Lotti, and Mairesse (2013), and Hölzl and Janger (2014. Coad (2011) presented empirical evidence that firms located on the frontier employ R&D resources more efficiently, generating significantly higher scores than the more distant firms.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis: Model Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this context, the goal of this research is to shed light in understanding the drivers of formal and informal OI by simultaneously analysing the firms’ internal and external drivers. Furthermore, we consider that the adoption of OI can be context-dependent (Ebersberger et al , 2011) because great differences exist owing to cultural heterogeneity (Muroveca and Prodan, 2009) and the different industrial conditions, public funding policies and national innovation systems (Reinstaller and Unterlass, 2011; Kafouros and Forsans, 2012). For this, we conducted the study in two European regions, Navarre (Spain), classified an innovator follower, and Noord Brabant (Netherlands), an innovator leader (Hollanders et al , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%