2016
DOI: 10.22459/ag.23.01.2016.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Section 18C, Human Rights, and Media Reform: An Institutional Analysis of the 2011–13 Australian Free Speech Debate

Abstract: The paper examines two Australian freedom-of-speech controversies between 2011 and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPF represents institutional trade-offs, and thus choices, in a world of imperfect property rights. The IPF has variously been applied to policy settlements around productivity and red tape (Berg forthcoming;Davidson 2013), the environment (Davidson 2014), media regulation (Berg and Davidson 2015), freedom of speech (Berg and Davidson 2016), innovation (Davidson and Potts 2015;Davidson and Potts 2016), education (Lane 2017), democracy (Allen et al 2017), and tobacco control (Davidson 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPF represents institutional trade-offs, and thus choices, in a world of imperfect property rights. The IPF has variously been applied to policy settlements around productivity and red tape (Berg forthcoming;Davidson 2013), the environment (Davidson 2014), media regulation (Berg and Davidson 2015), freedom of speech (Berg and Davidson 2016), innovation (Davidson and Potts 2015;Davidson and Potts 2016), education (Lane 2017), democracy (Allen et al 2017), and tobacco control (Davidson 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%