2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.032335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secret key rates for an encoded quantum repeater

Abstract: We investigate secret key rates for the quantum repeater using encoding [L. Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. A 79, 032325 (2009)] and compare them to the standard repeater scheme by Briegel, Dür, Cirac, and Zoller. The former scheme has the advantage of a minimal consumption of classical communication. We analyze the tradeoff in the secret key rate between the communication time and the required resources. For this purpose, we introduce an error model for the repeater using encoding which allows for input Bell state… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal resource depends on the rate, which is limited by the time delay from the two-way classical signaling (first and second generations) and the local gate operation (second and third generations, see details below) 23 . The physical resource depends on the total number of qubits needed for HEP (first and second generations) and QEC (second and third generations) 9 24 . We propose to quantitatively compare the three generations of QRs using a cost function 9 related to the required number of qubit memories to achieve a given transmission rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal resource depends on the rate, which is limited by the time delay from the two-way classical signaling (first and second generations) and the local gate operation (second and third generations, see details below) 23 . The physical resource depends on the total number of qubits needed for HEP (first and second generations) and QEC (second and third generations) 9 24 . We propose to quantitatively compare the three generations of QRs using a cost function 9 related to the required number of qubit memories to achieve a given transmission rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to entanglement distillation, several forward-quantumerror-corrected protocols have been proposed and analyzed [11,12], which can afford a better rate performance at the expense of more frequent memory-based repeaters capable of universal quantum logic. Some of the more recently proposed forward-coded protocols do not even need any matter quantum memories, but come at the expense of requiring fast quantum logic and feedforward at all-optical center stations, as well as a potentially huge overhead in terms of the number of photons used for error correction [13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the attenuation in the optical fiber poses a significant challenge for the long-distance transmission of single photons [9,10]. Quantum repeaters [11,12] solve the attenuation problem by dividing the total communication distance into shorter channels connected by intermediate nodes, where the photon loss is detected [13][14][15][16][17][18] and can be corrected by using an active mechanism [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In addition to photon loss errors, operation errors accumulate over the quantum channel that degrades the quality of the transmitted entangled state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%