2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.022357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-loss analysis of an efficient quantum repeater architecture

Abstract: We analyze an entanglement-based quantum key distribution (QKD) architecture that uses a linear chain of quantum repeaters employing photon-pair sources, spectral-multiplexing, linear-optic Bell-state measurements, multi-mode quantum memories and classical-only error correction. Assuming perfect sources, we find an exact expression for the secret-key rate, and an analytical description of how errors propagate through the repeater chain, as a function of various loss and noise parameters of the devices. We show… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
117
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve our result, we therefore have to decrease the probability of generating a photon pair per pulse below our current value of 19%. For instance, reducing the mean photon pair emission probability to 10% would, according to our model [23], result in an increase of the concurrence to 0.53 (keeping all other parameters unchanged). Note that alternative way to reduce the impact of multi-pair emissions are to exploit a quantum Zeno blockade to suppresses multi photons [37] or a quantum non-demolition measurement that reveals the number of simultaneously emitted photon pairs [38], thereby allowing in theory to completely ignore detections stemming from multi pair emissions.…”
Section: Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To improve our result, we therefore have to decrease the probability of generating a photon pair per pulse below our current value of 19%. For instance, reducing the mean photon pair emission probability to 10% would, according to our model [23], result in an increase of the concurrence to 0.53 (keeping all other parameters unchanged). Note that alternative way to reduce the impact of multi-pair emissions are to exploit a quantum Zeno blockade to suppresses multi photons [37] or a quantum non-demolition measurement that reveals the number of simultaneously emitted photon pairs [38], thereby allowing in theory to completely ignore detections stemming from multi pair emissions.…”
Section: Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To independently assess how experimental imperfections limit the amount of entanglement in the final biphoton state, we employ the method described in [23] with measured experimental parameters for heralding efficiency (1.96% at 795 nm and 5.8% at 1533 nm), HOM visibility (89%), mean photon pair number (19%) and fidelities (95%) for the individual sources. This leads to a density matrix having a concurrence of 0.43, i.e.…”
Section: Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional quantum repeaters rely on first creating and storing entanglement for elementary links and then extending the distance of entanglement by entanglement swapping [7,8]. Based on the experimental and theoretical progress in this area over the past few years, it is plausible that this approach will make it possible to extend the distance of entanglement distribution significantly beyond what is possible with direct transmission through optical fibers [8][9][10]. However, truly global distances are still very difficult to envision for repeaters based on fiber links.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation in going to further distances is dictated by the exponentially-growing loss factor in optical fibers [3]. Probabilistic quantum repeaters offer a solution to extend the communication distance to over thousands of kilometers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, such quantum repeaters rely on quantum memory modules [11] with characteristics that are hard to achieve with the current technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%