2016
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Towns and Poverty Reduction: Refocusing the Urbanization Agenda

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence further suggests that labor movements out of agriculture into the rural non-farm economy and secondary towns are especially effective in reducing poverty, much more than movements into big cities. So, it is not just the transition out of agriculture which is associated with poverty reduction, but its effectiveness in reducing poverty also depends on where the off-farm jobs become available (Christiaensen, DeWeerdt and Todo 2013, Dorosh and Thurlow 2014, Christiaensen and Kanbur 2016. This complements the observation that agricultural growth has a more powerful poverty reducing effect than does non-agricultural growth (Minten and Barrett 2008;de Janvry and Sadoulet 2009;Christiaensen, Demery and Kuhl 2011).…”
Section: Essentials Of Structural Transformation Of Agricultural and mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent evidence further suggests that labor movements out of agriculture into the rural non-farm economy and secondary towns are especially effective in reducing poverty, much more than movements into big cities. So, it is not just the transition out of agriculture which is associated with poverty reduction, but its effectiveness in reducing poverty also depends on where the off-farm jobs become available (Christiaensen, DeWeerdt and Todo 2013, Dorosh and Thurlow 2014, Christiaensen and Kanbur 2016. This complements the observation that agricultural growth has a more powerful poverty reducing effect than does non-agricultural growth (Minten and Barrett 2008;de Janvry and Sadoulet 2009;Christiaensen, Demery and Kuhl 2011).…”
Section: Essentials Of Structural Transformation Of Agricultural and mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another ongoing research effort in this spirit focuses on the role of secondary cities in reducing poverty in South Asia and Sub‐Saharan Africa (Christiaensen and Kanbur, ). This research develops the concept of “action space” as the range of possible destinations to which a migrant can realistically move at a given point in time and, intimately linked to this, the set of possible livelihoods at destination.…”
Section: Household Characteristics Versus Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the latter, several studies have documented the existence of an urban gradient, with average income higher and poverty levels lower in cities compared to secondary towns (e.g. Christiaensen and Kanbur, 2016). Large cities may also have markedly different food environments.…”
Section: Unpacking the Effects 61 The Composition Of The Urban Landsmentioning
confidence: 99%