Challenges in Measuring Poverty and Understanding its Dynamics: A South Asian Perspective

Abstract

SouthAsia's success at reducing poverty does not imply that the topic has become passé. Poverty rates are by now low, but this is because poverty lines are low as well. And the assessment of living standards and their dynamics are blurred by measurement and interpretation challenges. This paper relies mostly on South Asian examples to highlight four tensions: poorer versus richer households, rural versus urban locations, monetary versus non-monetary dimensions of wellbeing, and household characteristics versus context. The discussion is conducted against the backdrop of the two analytical approaches with South Asian roots that have shaped the debate for decades. This review leads to three main recommendations: household survey data has to be exploited in a more thorough manner, data that is increasingly available from other sources needs to be incorporated more systematically in the analysis, and the multiple dimensions of wellbeing should be better integrated in a common framework.JEL Codes: D31, I32, O1

Poverty‐happiness nexus: Does the use of regional poverty lines matter?

“…In general, consistent with Rama (2019), the results related to poverty variables obtained for the life domains are not always in line with findings related to overall life satisfaction, showing non‐negligible differences both in terms of estimated coefficient and statistical significance (Table 3 ).…”

“…The idea that some dimensions of life satisfaction can be involved at different levels of poverty and non-poverty is strongly accepted. Accounting for multidimensionality in the analysis of the impact of an individual's material condition on his/her level of subjective well-being can reveal novel insights on people's feelings (Rama, 2019), especially when a regional heterogeneity in the nexus is assumed (Graham & Felton, 2006). In this study, we investigate the informative power of life domains through the analysis of the impact of poverty conditions on alternative aspects of the lives of individuals.…”

Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness, and Holes in the Safety Net

“…It is also in line with the differences Johnson, Renwick, and Short (2011) finds when comparing aggregate numbers from HUD and the CPS for the entire United States. 11 The discrepancies in amounts recorded for true recipients are not as extreme for SNAP and public assistance. However, the correlations between accurate and reported amounts are low, and the standard deviations of the errors are on the order of 75 percent of mean amounts received.…”

Do countries capture their inclusive growth, sustainability, and poverty correctly? A study on statistical performance indicators defined by World Bank

“…But no system of estimating something as abstract as FI can be perfect and needs innovation and evolution in its approach to measure it. The same challenges are encountered in the estimation of poverty (Christiaensen and Shorrocks, 2012;Rama, 2019;Ravallion, 1996) and environmental concerns (Albrecht et al, 1982;Cruz and Manata, 2020). The issues in the measurement cause many challenges.…”