2013
DOI: 10.1109/map.2013.6578015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Surveillance Radar Antenna [Antenna Designer's Notebook]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SUM beam patterns are computed for 1060 MHz (the average between transmission and reception frequencies). The results of the theoretical SUM beam patterns’ calculation are comparable to those in [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Proposed Mssr Antennasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SUM beam patterns are computed for 1060 MHz (the average between transmission and reception frequencies). The results of the theoretical SUM beam patterns’ calculation are comparable to those in [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Proposed Mssr Antennasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) established the MSSR antenna requirements in [ 5 ] and [ 6 ], and several papers focused solely on specific aspects of antenna design, analyzing the radiation patterns obtained for various geometries [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The work in [ 7 ] proposed an MSSR antenna design containing 35 columns of dipoles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not recommended to design three different antennas due to the dependency of all three patterns in their processing part and also large amount of required weight and space. On the contrary, it is recommended to generate all three patterns by manipulating the array's excitation coefficients [15] or type of mode excitation [8]. For CTRL pattern only, one good suggestion is the use of a simple monopole antenna or even one of the array elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-known more-efficient alternative solution is to design a multi-beam feeding network. This idea, which has been used in radar systems for a long time [15,17,18], paves the way for maximum integration among all three beams, SUM, DIFF, and CTRL, resulting in miniaturization, simplification and reducing the price of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most aircraft are flying at high altitudes, reply transmissions often cover much wider areas than interrogations, leading to an increased frequency occupancy and interference level across large areas. To put this into perspective, surface interrogators usually have a rather narrow beam width of 2-4 degrees [11] whereas replies from aircraft can be received on the ground over distances of more than 400 km in all directions, depending on the aircraft's altitude and the surrounding geography.…”
Section: Mhz Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%