1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary structure creates mismatched base pairs required for high-affinity binding of cAMP response element-binding protein to the human enkephalin enhancer.

Abstract: Transactivation studies of the enkephalin enhancer indicate that two cAMP response elements (CRE-1 and CRE-2) are needed to mediate the transcriptional response to cAMP and to the CRE-binding protein (CREB) transcription factor. CRE-1 and CRE-2 are contained within a nearly palindromic region that can form stable hairpin structures in vitro. CREB binds only weakly to the native duplex enhancer and only within CRE-2. In contrast, CREB binds with high affinity to the hairpin in which CRE-1 and CRE-2 come togethe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
75
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of proteins whose interaction with DNA is based on conformation ± but not sequence-speci®c ± recognition has been documented (Bianchi et al, 1988;Herbert et al, 1993;Leith and Russel, 1993;Pearson et al, 1995;Solaro et al, 1995). Transcriptional regulation of many genes involves conformational changes in DNA (Delic et al, 1991;Hanke et al, 1995;Iyer and Struhl, 1995;Spiro et al, 1995;Michelotti et al, 1996), and binding of some transcription factors depends on the conformation of DNA within or adjacent to their binding sites (Grigoriev et al, 1992;Spiro et al, 1993;Hu et al, 1994;May®eld and Miller, 1994). At the level of the p53 protein, modi®cations of the p53 carboxy-terminal regulatory domain either by posttranslational modifications, alternative splicing (Kulesz-Martin et al, 1994;Flaman et al, 1996), or by binding of proteins mimicking the e ect of PAb421 binding would provide another level for determining the speci®city for transactivation of the ever growing list of potential p53 target genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of proteins whose interaction with DNA is based on conformation ± but not sequence-speci®c ± recognition has been documented (Bianchi et al, 1988;Herbert et al, 1993;Leith and Russel, 1993;Pearson et al, 1995;Solaro et al, 1995). Transcriptional regulation of many genes involves conformational changes in DNA (Delic et al, 1991;Hanke et al, 1995;Iyer and Struhl, 1995;Spiro et al, 1995;Michelotti et al, 1996), and binding of some transcription factors depends on the conformation of DNA within or adjacent to their binding sites (Grigoriev et al, 1992;Spiro et al, 1993;Hu et al, 1994;May®eld and Miller, 1994). At the level of the p53 protein, modi®cations of the p53 carboxy-terminal regulatory domain either by posttranslational modifications, alternative splicing (Kulesz-Martin et al, 1994;Flaman et al, 1996), or by binding of proteins mimicking the e ect of PAb421 binding would provide another level for determining the speci®city for transactivation of the ever growing list of potential p53 target genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promoters (2,3), terminators (4), amplified genes (5), and origins of DNA replication from prokaryotes (6 -8), viruses (9), and eukaryotes (10) all contain IRs. Origins of DNA replication from higher eukaryotes, such as monkeys and humans (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), are also enriched in IRs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that these non-specific electrostatic interactions are occurring primarily within the CREB bZIP domain, since the absorbance and elution profile from the size-exclusion column of CREB 254-327 is virtually identical to that of full-length CREB. Furthermore, CREB has been shown to bind with high affinity to hairpin binding sites [20], which may account for the tight association of the bZIP domain with contaminating tRNA. These observations raise the question as to how universal contaminating nucleic acid may be in purified preparations of proteins that have DNA binding activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%