2013
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary mutation in a coding mononucleotide tract in MSH6 causes loss of immunoexpression of MSH6 in colorectal carcinomas with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency

Abstract: Immunohistochemical staining for DNA mismatch repair proteins may be affected by various biological and technical factors. Staining variations that could potentially lead to erroneous interpretations have been recognized. A recently recognized staining variation is the significant reduction of staining for MSH6 in some colorectal carcinomas. The frequency and specific characteristics of this aberrant MSH6 staining pattern, however, have not been well analyzed. In this study of 420 colorectal carcinoma samples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, IHC can be intact in MSI-H tumors with germline mutations when the specific mutation(s) does not disrupt antibody-reactive epitope, 19 and IHC might not be the ideal method for detecting EMC in treated patients, as chemoradiation can reduce MMR protein expression in otherwise MSS tumors. 20 There are several possible mechanisms underlying the difference in MSI profiles seen in MSI-H EMCs and CRCs that, in part, may be attributable to differences in the biology of the two different types of epithelium. 21,22 First, like normal colonic and endometrial epithelium, MSI-H CRCs may have more rapid turnover and more rounds of DNA replication compared with those of EMCs, consequently leading to a larger nucleotide shift compared with that in MSI-H EMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IHC can be intact in MSI-H tumors with germline mutations when the specific mutation(s) does not disrupt antibody-reactive epitope, 19 and IHC might not be the ideal method for detecting EMC in treated patients, as chemoradiation can reduce MMR protein expression in otherwise MSS tumors. 20 There are several possible mechanisms underlying the difference in MSI profiles seen in MSI-H EMCs and CRCs that, in part, may be attributable to differences in the biology of the two different types of epithelium. 21,22 First, like normal colonic and endometrial epithelium, MSI-H CRCs may have more rapid turnover and more rounds of DNA replication compared with those of EMCs, consequently leading to a larger nucleotide shift compared with that in MSI-H EMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that there is a coding mononucleotide repeat in MSH6 that may become unstable and inactivate MSH6 in a mismatch repair-deficient tumor; those areas of the tumor in which the MSH6 mononucleotide repeat is unstable will lose immunostaining, while those areas in which the mononucleotide repeat does not become unstable will show intact staining. 9 Importantly, this 'clonal' MSH6 loss typically occurs in tumors that are mismatch repair deficient due to causes unrelated to MSH6, including sporadic mismatch repair-deficient tumors or tumors with germline mutations of mismatch repair genes besides MSH6.…”
Section: Msi Vs Ihcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should also keep in mind that nucleolar staining or complete loss of MSH6 staining has been described in colorectal cancer cases with prior radiation or chemotherapy, 3,4 and a significant reduction of MSH6 staining has been described in a small percentage of colorectal carcinomas with somatic mutations of the coding region microsatellites of the MSH6 gene in MLH1/PMS2-deficient carcinomas. 5 B: MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Analysis and BRAF Mutational Analysis.-Defective MMR in sporadic colorectal cancer is most often due to inactivation of the MLH1 gene promoter by hypermethylation (epigenetic silencing). The V600E mutation of the BRAF gene may be present in up to 70% of tumors with hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter.…”
Section: Explanatory Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%