2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary intraocular lens implantation after pediatric aphakia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This included the operated eye for unilaterally affected patients and a randomly selected eye from bilaterally affected patients. The results of our study and similar other studies are reported and summarized as weighted means [4][5][6][7][8][9] in Table 2. While the precise methods vary between our study and the other reported studies, this table allows for easy comparison of the studies' data concerning secondary IOL implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This included the operated eye for unilaterally affected patients and a randomly selected eye from bilaterally affected patients. The results of our study and similar other studies are reported and summarized as weighted means [4][5][6][7][8][9] in Table 2. While the precise methods vary between our study and the other reported studies, this table allows for easy comparison of the studies' data concerning secondary IOL implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The mean age at secondary IOL implantation in our cohort was 6.08±3.75 years with 54% undergoing secondary IOL implantation earlier than 5 years of age and an additional 22% between 5 and 8 years of age, which coincides with the period of active refractive growth of a child's eye. Nihalani and Vanderveen4 found a lower PE in their cohort of older children (mean age 9.1 years) undergoing secondary IOL implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The mean absolute value of PE at 3 months observed in the present study, albeit slightly higher, was comparable to that reported in limited number of previous paediatric secondary IOL series (table 2). 9 18 Moore et al 9 calculated the PE between 6 and 8 weeks whereas Nihalani and Vanderveen4 did the same between 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. In the current study 20% had an absolute PE within 0.5 D and 60% within 2 D. In a study of 61 eyes with secondary ciliary sulcus-fixated IOL implantation, Awad et al 6 found that 78% of the patients had a postoperative refraction ±2 D of the predicted value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations