2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary instability and subcritical transition of the leading-edge boundary layer

Abstract: The leading-edge boundary layer (LEBL) in the front part of swept airplane wings is prone to three-dimensional subcritical instability, which may lead to bypass transition. The resulting increase of airplane drag and fuel consumption implies a negative environmental impact. In the present paper, we present a temporal biglobal secondary stability analysis (SSA) and direct numerical simulations (DNS) of this flow to investigate a subcritical transition mechanism. The LEBL is modelled by the swept Hiemenz boundar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal amplification rate for the sinuous symmetry exhibits two peaks at x i ≈ 5 and x i ≈ 12 where ω i ≈ 0.48 and ≈ 0.4, respectively. One may remark that the onset of several modes for large streak amplitudes have also recently been observed by John et al [36] for the leading edge boundary layer near the attachment line. For the varicose case, ω i peaks for x i ≈ 12 with a value ≈ 0.5.…”
Section: Local Exponential Secondary Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The temporal amplification rate for the sinuous symmetry exhibits two peaks at x i ≈ 5 and x i ≈ 12 where ω i ≈ 0.48 and ≈ 0.4, respectively. One may remark that the onset of several modes for large streak amplitudes have also recently been observed by John et al [36] for the leading edge boundary layer near the attachment line. For the varicose case, ω i peaks for x i ≈ 12 with a value ≈ 0.5.…”
Section: Local Exponential Secondary Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…To this end, we designed a computational model of a BHV in an anatomically correct model of an AR. The governing equations were solved with a FSI solver (Nestola et al, 2019 ) which comprises a finite-element structural solver for soft tissue and a high-order Navier–Stokes solver that has been designed for the study of laminar-turbulent transition (e.g., Obrist et al, 2012 ; John et al, 2016 ). The FSI solver was verified and validated for canonical benchmarks in Nestola et al ( 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This HSS configuration is connected with vortices supported by the cross-flow situation for larger chordwise x positions downstream. It is therefore unstable at much lower Reynolds numbers than an LSS configuration with an inverted sense of rotation of the vortex pair (John, Obrist & Kleiser 2016).…”
Section: Primary Finite-amplitude Disturbance Umentioning
confidence: 99%